Question & Answer Board

Main
Q&A Page
Email a QuestionRailroadiana Home

Welcome to our Question & Answer Bulletin Board -- a bulletin board for collectors and anyone else to post questions about railroadiana and related history. Please note that we do not deal with contemporary railroading. This board is moderated (all volunteer) but is not staffed by "experts". Rather it relies on everyone to share what they know. Any question or reply about railroadiana is welcome except the following:

  • No questions or responses regarding values or what something is worth -- see About Values. Also, no questions or replies selling or looking for items, parts or services. This includes offers. We reserve the right to remove responses that are discourteous, inappropriate, or violate our policies.

Email questions to qa@railroadiana.org. Most questions are actually posted within a day or so. While an image to go along with the question is optional, it is strongly recommended and will help others find an answer. Email the image(s) as an attachment, but it must be YOUR OWN IMAGE. Re-posting a photo from Ebay is a copyright violation. Also see our Frequently Asked Questions or FAQs page and our Contact Us page for questions that we cannot reply to.

Latest 50 Questions:

 Q3760 Age of Handlan Lantern?  I was trying to find the year of this Handlan PRR fresnel globe lantern. If you can help it would be greatly appreciated.   [Click on image for larger version.] Posted Monday, July 6, 2020 by Sean   Post a Reply  Email a reply

A. The Handlan 2000 RR Lantern received patent number 1959128 in 1934 and appears to have been invented for railroad, not traffic, use.) Later the 2000 was constructed as a traffic/utility lantern using the same globe you have but a different body style. Google "Handlan 2000" for more information and pictures. Posted Tuesday, July 7, 2020 by LC

A. Just a quick reminder that the date the patent was granted is not the date of manufacture of an individual item. Patent dates do help by giving the earliest possible date the item could have been made, but without any further documentation, this lantern could have been made between 1934 and whenever Handlan stopped making this particular model. It is a nice lantern, do enjoy it !  Posted Wednesday, July 8, 2020 by JMS

 Q3759 What Do I Have?  Dad has a note on this that is a railroad lantern insert but I can't find anything like it online. Can you help me with identification? Thank you so much for your time & help.   [Click on image for larger version.] Posted Monday, July 6, 2020 by LB   Post a Reply  Email a reply

A. This very unusual item is too large to be used in any kind of railroad hand lantern. Next possibilities are headlights, but the curved plate behind the double wicks does not seem to be (or ever have been) reflectorized; I suspect it was to focus the heat from the flames rather than the light. The link shows a portable kerosene heater with a similar but larger concentrator assembly behind the heat source (a mantle in that case rather than wicks) but what looks like a similar idea. Other possibilities as a light source might be marine beacons, theater lighting, or maybe even a magic lantern projector, but none of those showed up with any burner assemblies looking even close to your item and all of them would have needed a mirrored surface on the concentrator.  Link 1  Posted Tuesday, July 7, 2020 by RJMc

A. Thanks so much for giving me possibilities! Lynn B Posted Tuesday, July 7, 2020 by LB

A. Something to consider is this unit may not be of US or North American manufacture, since kerosene lights and heaters were/are used worldwide. I am puzzled by the square slots on either side of the oblong wick tubes, and the round and rectangular holes in the BOTTOM of what appears to be a kerosene tank. Do the holes in the bottom connect up to the slots in the top? If so, that might have provided forced air to the flame to increase the heat and/or light. But that is just speculation; an arrangement like that would be kind of unusual for a unit using a small tank of fuel. And the wick adjuster knobs seemt be arranged to set very precisely, with locking nuts on their shafts -- also an unusual feature. THe hole in the back of the concentrator seems to provide a 'peephole' thru the back plate. That would be so the wicks could be adjusted without pullng the unit out of whatever larger device it was mounted in. And there does not appear to be provision for any kind of chimney or globe to enclose the flame.  Posted Tuesday, July 7, 2020 by RJMc

A. @ RJMc, the Link1 you included in your first answer paragraph does not work ... not sure why.  Posted Wednesday, July 8, 2020 by JMS

A. Apparently there are restrictions on using the image. It worked as a link when I first found it. The following two links are to different kerosene heaters that also have a reflector; maybe they will work better. Otherwise just search on "reflector kerosene heater" to see other examples -- but note that none of them still look quite like the item in question.  Link 1  Link 2  Posted Wednesday, July 8, 2020 by RJMc

A. I contacted Miles Stair at his WickShoppe website (see Link) hoping that he might recognize this mystery unit. We compared notes about the strange features, but he also was able to identify it, despite having voluminous info on all kinds of wicks and devices that use them. He does have all kinds of wicks available suitable for restoring all kinds of kerosene lamps, lanterns, and heaters to operation.  Link 1  Posted Thursday, July 9, 2020 by RJMc

A. I mis-spoke above: Miles was also NOT able to identify it. RJMc Posted Friday, July 10, 2020 by RJMc

 Q3758 Railroad Passes  Did all passes have print on the back? I found this beauty; it looks 100% legit but there is not print of any kind on the back. It was found in a period scrapbook among many items of this era. Thoughts?   [Click on image for larger version.] Posted Monday, June 29, 2020 by Kevin   Post a Reply  Email a reply

A. Did you hold it up to a light source and look for a printer's watermark in the paper? Is it very thin gauge or heavier stock? Any ink bleed through to the back? Signs of uneven trimming along sides? Posted Tuesday, June 30, 2020 by ShastaRoute

A. It looks good to us! Being a complimentary pass and that old, we would think it is OK. "Paper" is extremely hard to date but especially if it was with contemporary pieces it is probably legit. Can you find a "paper" authority, does not have to be a railroad person, possibly a museum conservator or book dealer (?) We also wonder if back in that day all the railroads may not have printed info on all the backs of passes because they weren't experiencing the reasons for doing it ... just a thought. I don't know if it will be helpful but Link 1 is a book about antique printing processes and paper, and even dating the paper. Best wishes and good luck !  Link 1  Posted Saturday, July 4, 2020 by JMS

A. The book I just mentioned is for sale on Amazon - Link 1. It discusses all kinds of printing procedures and how to date them as well as paper. It's "art" oriented but the advice is good. Just a thought, get a good magnifying glass or jeweler loupe and look at the word PASS, and the decoration/design behind the word COMPLIMENTARY. If you see round dots or squares, even the tiniest ever, the printing likely is "screen printed" (Link 2). If you see lines it is engraving. Screen printing visible to the naked eye is modern. Link 1  Link 2  Posted Saturday, July 4, 2020 by JMS

A. Noted above, there are 'reasons' for printing on the backs of later passes. That has to do with restrictions imposed by the Interstate Commerce Commission under later Federal laws to prevent the RR's from using free transportation for political lobbying. Noting that your pass is written to give free and unlimited transportation to the "Hon(orable) ...McLaine AND family" of the House of Representatives it is easy to see how that might get favorable treatment when legislation affecting the RR got considered. RR pass issuance (lobbying) became a hot national scandal to the point that whole books were written about "The "Railroad Problem" -- entirely focussed on the practices of pass issuance to various groups for free transportation. So the writing on the back of a lot of more modern passes is where the pass user must certify that they ARE eligible under law to receive the pass and use it (i.e. that they are NOT a politician) In later practice RR's could issue passes only to personnel of RR companies and some related contractors such as Western Union. Posted Sunday, July 5, 2020 by RJMc

A. See the Link for the full text of the 1917 book "The Railroad Problem." Page 244 discusses the pass scandals where not only politicians but newspapermen and others were issued free passes. The other chapters of the book cover other interesting issues such as competition, economics, etc. of the RR industry in 1917. Link 1  Posted Sunday, July 5, 2020 by RJMc

A. Still, be aware of the Xerox Picasso (scroll down in Link 1) problem. So good and hard to tell. The number was not filled in on the pass, but some passes never actually ended up going to the intended party and the number was probably added only when finally issued. And yes, passes that did not go out to the intended recipient did survive to be recovered...I have one with it's envelopes as well as one of those Owl copies. The answer to authentication may be in the ink used for the signatures. Link 1  Posted Tuesday, July 7, 2020 by ShastaRoute

 Q3757 First Generation Dietz Vesta  This lantern is seen how often? Patent date 12-15-96. Hi-Top, Bellbottom, sliding brass door to light wick. Dietz Driving gear for wick rising. Takes 6 inch globe. Stamped on top of dome is R.R. LANTERN Dietz Vesta. Google 'VESTA VALHALLA' Carl Ellerman. I would think this model is seldom seen, being 124 years old. Thank you for more information.  Posted Friday, June 19, 2020 by Bruce   Post a Reply  Email a reply

A. As stated by Dietz: This model was the first RR Lantern produced by Dietz. It may never be seen by collectors. Not even once. Posted Wednesday, July 1, 2020 by dinnertrain46

A. I’m not sure what the comment “It may never be seen by collectors. Not even once” means, but there are many known examples of the earliest Dietz Vesta bellbottom RR lantern in collections. It takes a no. 39 globe, same as other no. 39 models of the era. Posted Monday, July 6, 2020 by A Swoyer

A. This model is not a"39". Yes, a 39 is found all the day long. Also, 39's do not have a sliding brass door to lite the wick. This one does. Also,this model has the gear drive to raise the wick. Dietz is right, people will not see this model, that is 124 years old. Collectors all have the "39", This model is pre model 39. When did anyone ever see this model ? Posted Tuesday, July 7, 2020 by Dinnertrain46

A. The earliest Dietz Vesta bellbottom takes a no. 39 globe, 5-3/8” tall, same as most other tall globe RR models of the era. My example has the sliding brass door just above the left tube entry into the bottom cylinder, as well as the gear-driven wick raiser. See photo link. Mine appears to be identical to Carl Ellerman’s as photographed and described in his work “Vesta Valhalla.” I would characterize this large, first Dietz Vesta RR model as scarce, but not rare. Several examples are known to exist in collections. I’ve never seen one of these factory-embossed with RR initials. All known examples are unmarked. Link 1  Link 2  Posted Wednesday, July 8, 2020 by A Swoyer

 Q3756 Bell Display Help?  I just purchased a Graham White double action bell and was wondering if anybody has any pictures of a display holder that you’ve made for this type of bell.   [Click on image for larger version.] Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2020 by JM   Post a Reply  Email a reply

A. The Link is to a pic of a similar bell mounted the very basic way these bells were/are mounted both on the fronts of later-model steam locomotives and under the running boards of diesels. If the bell is to be operated with air, I am not sure even the fairly robust feet shown in the pic would be enough to keep it from tipping over from the momentum of the clapper, unless the whole mount is secured to a wall or floor.  Link 1  Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2020 by RJMc

A. For additional VERY comprehensive info about bells, air ringers and various mounting methods, in particular see the Link to Larry Curran's "Bells and Birmans" website.  Link 1  Posted Sunday, June 28, 2020 by RJMc

 Q3755 Globe Removal Problem  I recently found this old lantern marked Armspear MFG CO., New York '1925' and have been cleaning it up. I've spent quite a bit of time trying to get the globe out but it is not cooperating. I was wondering how I can get the globe out, if I can at all.  Posted Saturday, June 13, 2020 by Izzy   Post a Reply  Email a reply

A. The '1925' is the lantern model no. The Link below is to the Archives here on the RRiana site to a 1933 Armspear catalog that shows the 1925 model lantern in great detail, with some exploded views which will let you be sure that it is SUPPOSED to come apart. A major question needs to be "Is the globe marked in any way?" If not, globes are easily replaced and you may want to be more vigorous about trying to get it out. If the globe has cast lettering of RR initials or etched lettering you should be much more gentle with it. That said, the standard tricks for this are soaking in penetrant oil, such as WD40 or PB Blaster, and/or fairly gentle applications of heat and cold so as to avoid breaking the globe. You might try 'cold soaking' the whole lantern in the refrigerator, then immersing only the metal bottom part in warm water to see if that helps break things loose.  Link 1  Posted Saturday, June 13, 2020 by RJMc

A. The Link below is to that same Armspear catalog but shows you several pages all about the 1925 model lantern. It also explains why you will probably find 'wadding' or 'packing' material which soaked up the kerosene inside the font (when you are hopefully able to extract the globe, and then the font.) Link 1  Posted Saturday, June 13, 2020 by RJMc

 Q3754 More Key IDs  Here are the next 3 keys I'm hoping to get IDs for. The D&H T Slaight key I'm wondering if it is an early cut Delaware and Hudson or possibly another road listed on this site's data base? Next a JL Howard D&M. Is it an early cut Detroit and Mackinac or one of many D&M road names also on the data base? Finally the A&W hex DP RR. About the only possibility I can find is Denver Pacific, but considering it was merged into UP and KP in 1870 I don't think it is old enough to be Denver Pacific. In fact I had two of the DP RR keys at one time, both identical. The seller said Dakota Pacific but I have found nothing from that road. I'm hoping for good responses to these particular keys. Thanks.   [Click on image for larger version.] Posted Monday, June 8, 2020 by Jim   Post a Reply  Email a reply

A. My experience with Delaware & Hudson keys seems to show they used the same cut from early when they still called themselves a canal company until the end. Good luck in your she arch for info Posted Tuesday, June 9, 2020 by tml

A. The D&H key is a very different cut than the "usual" one the D&H used on their standard switch locks for essentially their entire existence. The standard dog-leg cut is what is shown in the AmRys switch key guide. Dave Stewart's book shows that cut and a second one (with a dog-leg the opposite way) and Johnson's book shows a couple, but nothing like Jim's pictured key. I wonder if there was a castback or other uncommon lock it was made for... the only other situation would be if there was another line with the same D&H initials ... this is an old one !! Posted Thursday, June 11, 2020 by JMS

A. I wonder if the D&H key had anything to do with their gravity railroad - it certainly appears to be old enough. See Link 1. Unfortunately the history books never seem to be able to include information about tools and hardware.  Link 1  Posted Friday, June 12, 2020 by JMS

 Q3753 UP Anvil  I believe this is an anvil used by maintenance of way on the main line of Union Pacific at North Plate in the 1860s thru early 1880s. The hole at the bottom is exactly the size of 56 lb rail which was the original rail used when UP was built. Do you think this is what it is? I can not find anything on it. What do you think? Thanks.   [Click on image for larger version.] Posted Tuesday, June 2, 2020 by Gib L   Post a Reply  Email a reply

A. My guess is that it did not begin life as an anvil, but may have gotten 'repurposed' for that use. I suspect its original use may have been as one part of a counterweight. The bottom slot would fit onto a rectangular beam and the curled top edge would engage another member to keep it in place in a row of weights, and also serve as a lifting point for moving it. Counterweights come in a million or so shapes and sizes (see link), and have been used on things ranging from war machines in the Middle Ages, windows, elevators, tractors, cranes, to movable bridges. So there are a lot of possibilities, some on the RR and many not. Link 1  Posted Wednesday, June 3, 2020 by RJMc

A. I saw a picture of an old crane with a caption on its use of old civil war solid shot cannon balls used as a counter weight in a basket on the rear end. Posted Thursday, June 4, 2020 by LC

 Q3752 N&W J Cylinder Plate  I recently acquired this repro N&W J cylinder plate. It is 6.75 in. wide, of cast aluminum. The seller knew only that it belonged to a gentleman who worked in the Roanoke steam shop, as had his father and grandfather. The seller believed that it may have been a commemorative gift of some sort. I find the inclusion of '611' interesting, and I also wonder what 'CJHA' stands for? Any information you can share will be much appreciated.   [Click on image for larger version.] Posted Saturday, May 23, 2020 by David   Post a Reply  Email a reply

A. Wild guess...the "C" is offset, so it be a copyright symbol. JHA could be the name for a historical association, a foundry name, or ?. Posted Sunday, May 24, 2020 by ShastaRoute

 Q3751 PRR Glasses  Hi Everyone, I post this every couple years to see if I can find out anything from anyone. I bought these 6 PRR glasses as a set from a flea market. The seller said they came from a railroader's estate. The 6 glasses are in a fitted but unmarked cardboard box, probably the original. Each glass has a Northeast Corridor city on them. I can find nothing about these glasses and have never seen another set like them. Are they PRR glasses? Real or fantasy? Were they sold in PRR lounge cars? Given out to ticket agents or employees? Were they a shipper's premium given to good customers? I have been trying to find out for about 5 years. They are great for serving guests, since each glass has a different station you can 'assign' a station to each guest so the drinks don't get mixed up! Thank you   [Click on image for larger version.] Posted Monday, May 18, 2020 by JN   Post a Reply  Email a reply

A. Could possibly relate to PRR-GW-8 logo on glass plate in Sparkling Crystal by Larry Paul. That one footnoted as unconfirmed report of RR usage with no maker. Does not include those destinations you have for PRR Main Line stops. That might raise eyebrows as sytem wares would be expected to be more general, unless there was proof of dedicated services. Also, five different stops in one box, rather than five boxes each having the same logo....but maybe if they shipped only as sets each time. Lack of shipper info on box suggests several of each could have come in a bulk box. Posted Tuesday, May 19, 2020 by ShastaRoute

A. Meant 6, not 5. Posted Tuesday, May 19, 2020 by ShastaRoute

A. JN - do these glasses have a bottom marker mark ? I am guessing there may be a scrolling, loopy, script letter "L" raised on the bottom, which would mean they were made by Libbey Glass. Maybe they are not marked. My immediate thought was a safety award, but I have never seen these designs either. That red logo is shown in several of Paul's illustrations for PRR glassware.  Posted Thursday, May 21, 2020 by JMS

A. As mentioned, that cardboard box of glasses is the kind of 'premium' or souvenir often provided at conventions as well as to shippers; maybe a souvenir of a gathering of one of the major unions based on the PRR, or even a fan organization such as NRHS. (And often taken home from there, put on a shelf, and never seen again until estate sales). For those purposes it would have been the sponsoring organization that ordered the glasses, not the PRR. These are also very similar to items seen in RR museum gift shops. In thinking about possible promotional uses, maybe for the PRR Congressional trains or for the Metroliner original startup which began under PRR, I found it interesting that Trenton is included but Wilmington, DE, is not. But after checking, Wilmington is NOT the capital of Delaware, Dover is. And Trenton is the capital of NJ.  Posted Thursday, May 21, 2020 by RJMc

A. The border width (shadow lines) would not match most of the samples in Sparkling Crystal, but is very close to that lone plate. Of course, it is difficult to make judgements without both book and item in the same hand, and not even easy then. Lack of a maker mark would be consistent with the plate. If it is an unoffial issue, I would expect to see more surfacing. (And some glass makers like Libbey actually sold stuff at plant sites too.) At the same time, items specific to dedicated service or samples from mock-ups used to get contracts are in much shorter supply, and few known samples ever do show up (almost one of a kind). Survival rates approach zero over the long. Posted Saturday, May 23, 2020 by ShastaRoute

 Q3750 Builders Plates  I just purchased this repro GG-1 Builder's Plate. Can anybody tell me which GG-1 this would have been from? If it is a preserved one chances are I have a photo. I want to put the photo with the plate and I cannot find any references correlating builders number to road number. Thank you.   [Click on image for larger version.] Posted Monday, May 18, 2020 by JN   Post a Reply  Email a reply

A. Construction numbers and corresponding road numbers in this list (Link 1). The 4313 is in footnote #2 and it seems to transfer sequentially in order. Link 1  Posted Tuesday, May 19, 2020 by ShataRoute

 Q3749 Fake Lamps?  I just bought a matching set of these and was trying to find some information if they are real or if any remakes were made of them? Also about what years the originals were made? The man we bought them from is an antiques collector and got them at an estate auction. He said he took them out of the box and put them together. Thank you.   [Click on image for larger version.] Posted Sunday, May 10, 2020 by PA   Post a Reply  Email a reply

A. These appear to me to be original caboose lamps that were made by Adams and Westlake. They may have been restored and painted by someone at some point. One way that you can date lamps is by the burners and the thumb wheel that adjusts the wick. Here is a link to The Lampworks, which is Dan Edminster's business that sells antique lamp parts. This is a history of Plume and Atwood Manufacturing Company, aka P&A.  Link 1  Posted Monday, May 11, 2020 by KM

A. KM, the Link you posted is not working. Please check the address? thanks!  Posted Monday, May 11, 2020 by JMS

A. Sorry about the bad link. If you search Dan Edminster The Lampworks it will get you to his website. There is a lot of information there and if you check the site map you will find a very detailed history of the Plume and Atwood Company. Part pf P&A was taken over by the Risden Company in the late 1950's and the burner knob that is involved here says P&A Risden Co. so the burner is likely made after that date. At some point Adams and Westlake may have sold caboose lamps to the general public and it is possible that these lamps may have never seen railroad service particularly because the previous owner/antique collector said "he took them out of the box and assembled them." But they are not "fakes" and are made by Adlake even if they never were owned by a railroad.  Posted Friday, May 15, 2020 by KM

A. Although it is true that this same style of lamp was used in many places other than RR's (boats, for example, and buildings before electricity became widely available) the RR's did buy them new in the box. The collars on these, supporting the top of the globe and the shade, are particularly indicative of mobile use with occasional hard knocks from different directions. The RR's would have been buying them to equip newly-converted bunk cars, for example. or for when they built their own cabooses or rider cars, or for replacements after accidents. And like many things, they probably sat on shelves, new in the box and never opened, in store rooms long after everything went electric.  Posted Friday, May 15, 2020 by RJMc

A. The burner knob doesnt have ridden? on it. The last 4 letters are ston. Which looks more like the haston com. to me. Still working on a date.  Posted Sunday, May 24, 2020 by PA

 Q3748 More Key IDs?  Here are the next 3 keys I'm hoping to get IDs for. the first I'm told is Columbus and Greenville but I really question the extremely high serial number. Why would a relative shortline have a need for 25,000+ keys? I do have 2 other switch key cuts known (by me). So can anyone verify if it is indeed Columbus and Greenville? I have seen similar keys to mine pictured all with an extremely high serial number. Next an adlake CVRY and wondering if it's Central Vermont RIp Track or some other purpose? Hope someone knows. The Fraim CVRCO I was once told was from some interurban electric line from SE United States, possibly Georgia. But I honestly forgot, so does anyone know?   [Click on image for larger version.] Posted Friday, May 8, 2020 by Jim   Post a Reply  Email a reply

A. The Switchkey Directory shows No. 2 and says 'Central Vermont.' A possibility for No. 3 would be the Cuyahoga Valley Railway, the in-house steel mill shortline which supported the Jones & Laughlin operations in Cleveland, OH. (nothing at all to do with the current Scenic RR operations.) Posted Friday, May 8, 2020 by RJMc

 Q3747 Milk Cans  Were the milk cans that railroads hauled all Galvanized /Stainless Steel in color or did a particular railroad paint any cans a certain color?  Posted Monday, May 4, 2020 by Tom   Post a Reply  Email a reply

A. Usually the farmer/supplier owned and maintained the cans, not the RR, making standardization much less likely. But contaminated milk has long been recognized as a major problem. So health department regulations in different cities and states may have required the bare metal finishes. See the Link for current extensive PA state regulations on dairy products. For handling milk, it was certainly easier to keep just the bare metal surfaces sanitized -- meaning thoroughly washed every day and with (hopefully) very hot soapy water that would be very hard on paint. Also enter 'milk can' in the search by word or phrase box to see a lot more prior discussion of milk cans. Link 1  Posted Monday, May 4, 2020 by RJMc

A. Thanks RJMc. I recently saw a milk can with a label marked PRREL. Would this stand for Pennsylvania Railroad Erie Lackawanna? Posted Saturday, May 9, 2020 by Tom

A. The 'Erie Lackawanna' part is unlikely, since it would be very unusual for trains from two different RR's to be working any given route to pick up milk and return the empty cans even in situations where two or more RR's operated over the same tracks. More likely it stands for some particular route of the PRR. And as to the paint on cans, looking at the many, many pix on the web, the wildly painted ones are all in flea markets and antique stores.  Posted Monday, May 11, 2020 by RJMc

A. Didn't Penn control some lines into East Liverpool OH? Could it be for a yard or terminal facility? Posted Thursday, May 14, 2020 by ShastaRoute

A. It is certainly interesting. I was thinking that maybe it could be PRR East Line. Although I never heard that before. I do agree with RJMc. I highly doubt it stands for Erie Lackawanna. I have several milk cans with labels but none marked with PRREL.  Posted Saturday, May 16, 2020 by Tom

A. S-gaugers Article (Link 1) shows PRR milksheds went out more than 500 miles of territory in early 1900's. Markings should probably be to show who owned cans for return purposes...even Fred Harvey had embossed ones for their operations. And Ohio was a milk source for some roads. Link 1  Posted Saturday, May 16, 2020 by ShastaRoute

A. EL Historical Society can definitely place PRR trains up to 1940's (Link 1). The maps locate a freight house off the station. Also found PRR bringing milk (with partner company) into NY City by reefer in 1912, and outbreaks of diseases in Beaver County affecting dairies in 1915. Probably a whole lot more if deeply searched flipping keywords. Link 1  Posted Saturday, May 16, 2020 by ShastaRoute

A. A more likely approach would be if there is an individual farmer or supplier named on the tag, for geographic context. Unfortunately, unlike Railway Post Offices (RPO's) the milk traffic was almost by definition all a local operation centered on the urban area where the milk went every day, and working with relatively few farmer/suppliers and just one RR on each route. For RPO's, the USPO organized and operated the whole nationwide network, so there are historical records available even now as to where all the different routes went. There was no such organizing body for the milk traffic, and hence almost no records. And very few RR's over the years -- thru depressions, mergers, etc etc -- have retained any of their own internal records that may have existed at the time.  Posted Sunday, May 17, 2020 by RJMc

A. The 1910 Guide to the Railways listings for the PRR show over 11,000 miles of track (!!) being operated to over 2300 listed stations. As stated in the excellent "S Gaugers" article in the Link above, many of those stations handled milk in one way or another, so there are a huge number of possibilities. It is somewhat surprising that the same 1910 Guide does not list any RR officials (for PRR or other RRs) by title who have direct responsibilities for all the massive volume of milk traffic --and presumably revenue -- being handled related to dairy products. It seems the general freight organization on each RR must have handled it in due course, again reflecting the basically local nature of the business. This raises the question of "Who paid the freight (bill)-- and how and when?" for what must have been tens of thousands of transactions every day, if you count individual cans. And those prices probably drove the economics of the entire dairy industry.  Posted Monday, May 18, 2020 by RJMc

 Q3746 Builders Plate ID?  I have a Baldwin round builder plate that I have been trying to determine who the locomotive was made for. The number is 40216 and was made in July 1913. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you.  Posted Monday, May 4, 2020 by PB   Post a Reply  Email a reply

A. My Baldwin records indicate that 40216 was built for W. Pensacola Creosote Works as their #1 an 0-4-0 in 2'6" gauge with 36" drivers, 14 x 18" cylinders, later went to the L&N as their Tie Plant #4  Posted Monday, May 4, 2020 by COD

 Q3745 Piper CPR Lamp  Greetings from the U.K. I purchased this lamp at an auction here last year. It is stamped NL Piper Toronto and is embossed CPR C. I'm in the process of stripping off the awful silver paint job and have discovered the base appears to be galvanized metal. The center section looks cast metal, with the top tin plate. Two crude additions of red and green glass had been added (not original?) over the clear convex ringed lenses. The oil reservoir is also stamped Piper. The lamp seems original and I was wondering if anyone has any details regarding it? I'm guessing it's a caboose lamp as it has the bracket on the base. Couple of questions: What colour would it have been painted? What colour lenses should it have? (Guessing clear may not be original either?) What is the little lidded box for on the rear? Kind regards,   [Click on image for larger version.] Posted Wednesday, April 29, 2020 by Keith   Post a Reply  Email a reply

A. Barrett and Gross's Illustrated Encyc of RR Lighting Vol. 2 on RR Lamps has extensive info on the long history of the various Piper companies and the very wide range of lamps they made. The N.L. Piper Co. was in business in Toronto between about 1900 and 1930. They used the same basic body as your lamp for multiple purposes: markers, train order signals, and classification lamps -- all illustrated in Barrett. Your lamp best fits the class light description based on the type of mounting bracket, the changeable lens colors, and the hinged service door. The rectangular 'pocket' box held the colored filter lenses not in use at any given time. Class lamps typically needed 3 colors: clear/white for running extra, green for running in multiple sections of trains, and red for a marker when the engine was running in reverse. A description of a very similar station train order lamp mentions the brass font. And all of the Piper lamps pictured in Barrett are finished in black -- actually very important for safety to make the illuminated lenses stand out at night.  Posted Thursday, April 30, 2020 by RJMc

A. Thanks RJMc for the comprehensive reply, most informative.  Posted Saturday, May 2, 2020 by KW

A. A key difference between marker lamps and class lamps: in actual use a class lamp had to display just one color to all directions. So you would need two or more green filters, etc to have a complete set for one class light. When they made so-called 'automatic' changing class lamps,the single selector lever switched the color on all sides. A single marker usually displayed a combination of colors: red and green, red and yellow and the combination and pointing direction changed the meaning, usually accomplished by rotating the whole lamp body or changing to a different mounting shoe so that add-on filters were not usually required for markers. Before everyone on the RR had a radio in his pocket, and before there was a telephone box at every siding switch, the indications provided by the class lights, switch lamps and markers were life-and-death critical to the operations to avoid collisions. This is why such intense design effort was used to produce such durable hardware by RR's that often preferred not to spend money.  Posted Monday, May 4, 2020 by RJMc

 Q3744 Armspear Lamp Questions  I purchased this Armspear lamp on-line and after cleaning all the dust off of it I have a few questions. I believe it to be a switch lamp. Is there a way to narrow down the year of production based on the design? There are two hard to read tags on it with several patent dates. The smaller blue glass lenses are marked Corning and the larger orange lenses are marked Kopp. Are they original, and if so, is it unusual the two colors are from different manufacturers on the lantern? What is the meaning of the raised S 120 on the base of the mounting bracket? There is a small raised circular area between two of the lenses on one side of the lantern, about the size of a quarter. Is it a knock-out for adding something? The burner is marked The Adams & Westlake Company. Is it most likely original to the lantern? I can not find any railroad company reference on it. Was Armspear common for any specific railroad line? Finally, how does the Armspear brand rank among the other railroad lantern brands as far as quality and popularity among collectors? Thank you!   [Click on image for larger version.] Posted Monday, April 27, 2020 by Jeff   Post a Reply  Email a reply

A. See the Link which takes you to the Archives on this RRiana site to an illustrated 1933 Armspear catalog. Armspear was heavily promoting your type of lamp at that time, as being very versatile, and the catalog shows exploded views and parts lists for your model of lamp. It is definitely set up to be a switch lamp, determined by the cast base. The S120 in the base is probably the casting/part no. for that exact base. Look up inside the hollow socket in the base: there may be cast RR initials on one of the side walls of the socket. If there is no ID tag or stamping, that's your best chance of possibly confirming which of many Armspear customer RR's that originally purchased it. The small circle between the lenses might have been for a 'peep hole' window to let a maintainer adjust the wick height/flame once servicing was complete and everything was closed up in normal operating position. As highlighted in the Armspear catalog, the various piece parts were widely standardized across the entire North American RR industry, and Armspear refers to 'reclamation'-- the process of lamps being brought in and overhauled many times to extend their often decades-long service life. During that process every imaginable combination of mix-and-match happened so there is no way to know which parts may have been original to the lamp. And if it didn't happen then, it often happened later as collectors changed everything around. Enter 'switch lamp' in the Search by Word' box to see lots of discussion about the various lens colors and combinations that were used.  Link 1  Posted Tuesday, April 28, 2020 by RJMc

A. The 'peep hole' was usually in the top of the lamp body. If your small circle is in the bottom half, it might have been to allow using a longer external wick raiser shaft, since the burner you have has the short version. And congratulations on having the small glass chimney; many switch lamps ended up without them both before and after leaving RR service. Posted Tuesday, April 28, 2020 by RJMc

A. >>>>>>Gentlemen, just wanted to add upon examining the top circle I described closer you can see through parts of it where paint has worn off, it's actually a glass disc? Were they sometimes painted over to prevent any clear light from showing? Is it odd that the wick raiser thing you turn can not be turned in a full circle? It actually strikes the top of the base and can only be turned fully when the burner is unscrewed and seperated. There is a covered hole on the lower half of the lantern that is more in line for an extended wick raiser access. From the inside of the lantern the hole can be exposed by sliding over the piece of metal covering it. Thanks again! Posted Tuesday, April 28, 2020 by Jeff

A. The paint covering the peep hole window is just lazy or careless repainting of the whole lamp. Maybe by the RR, or a later owner who didn't have to maintain a bunch of lamps every day in the field. Posted Wednesday, April 29, 2020 by RJMc

 Q3743 Inspector Lantern  I have a Acme Inspector lamp (production date stamp S-11-26) that I want to clean up and have some questions I hope you can help with. It has the 'mercury' glass type reflector. On the back side of the reflector, there is a hole (which I assume was used when the glass was blown / molded) covered with a cloth backed piece of paper that has come loose. Can you tell me what type of adhesive I should use to re-attach this with. Also, the silvering solution on the front side directly across from the hole has worn away (about a dime sized spot) is there a way to restore the missing finish before I re-cover the hole. The flat braided wick is about 3 inches long and has a piece of cloth loosely stitched to it, hanging down into the fuel tank. Was this the original configuration, or just something someone added to use more of the wick when it became too short to reach the fuel? Thanks,   [Click on image for larger version.] Posted Sunday, April 26, 2020 by SR   Post a Reply  Email a reply

A. Regarding the mirrored reflector, there are many articles on the web about "DIY Re-Silvering Of Mirrors." And the silvering processes are also written up in various chemical laboratory 'how to' handbooks. But any process such as that, similar to electroplating, requires extremely careful preparation, cleaning and handling of the surface if the new coating is to stick and provide a smooth, presentable reflector. And in your case, with such a small bad spot, you would likely threaten the remaining original coating. Since the majority of your surface seems to be a beautiful mirror, I would be inclined to suggest accepting it as is --'wart' and all. To have much of a hope of a perfect (matched0 surface all the way across, you might have to remove the existing mirroring and start over. And that might well result in a total loss rather than a total restoration.  Posted Sunday, April 26, 2020 by RJMc

A. You can get a new wick from Woody Kirkman at lanterns.net. Posted Monday, April 27, 2020 by LC

A. Don't see a filler cap there, you can get one at Woody Kirkman Posted Monday, April 27, 2020 by DC

A. If I'm not mistaken, these mirrored reflectors are standard equipment made in standard sizes to fit all kinds of lamps. If it was me I would take it along with me to antique shops and check out auctions for an identical twin in more perfect condition. Try to find antique lighting specialists. These are not the commonest thing but definitely are not rare. It is definitely good advice to not tamper with re-silvering, unless you know what you are doing and have experience. It's not like paint.  Posted Wednesday, April 29, 2020 by JMS

 Q3742 Adlake Kero #300 Lantern  My question relates to the article, 'Adams & Westlake Kero Lanterns: The Last Stand', in railroadiana.org. The article states that the month and year stamped on the bottom of this lantern was eliminated in 1964. The article also states that the manufacturer started drilling an oil drain hole in the bottom of the lantern in 1965 or 1966. Attached are two photos: a 1959 Adlake Kero lantern with a drain hole, and a 1961 Adlake Kero lantern with a drain hole. Since the article is clearly incorrect, does anyone know when Adams & Westlake started drilling drain holes in the bottom of their Adlake Kero lanterns? The company still makes these lanterns today and these subtle changes help me tell the age of the lanterns post 1964. Thanks,   [Click on image for larger version.] Posted Wednesday, April 22, 2020 by John  Link 1     Post a Reply  Email a reply

A. As the holes go through the lettering, it looks like someone drilled the holes after the lantern left the factory without drain holes. I have one of the Adlake lanterns made post Rail Road era and it has the drain hole but no lettering on the bottom. The lid is stamped "RAILROAD". Posted Thursday, April 23, 2020 by LC

A. The drain hole was added in 1956. Posted Tuesday, April 28, 2020 by JFR

A. I would tend to agree with LC. A close up of the hole shows what appear to be less than perfectly smooth edges, somebody drilled it. Actually, that is a good idea because it prevents condensation/rust inside, but this does appear to be an "after market" hole. The original holes would have been stamped out of the flat sheet metal before it was cut into rounds that would be molded into fount holders. These have perfectly smooth edges from stamping, not drilling.  Posted Wednesday, April 29, 2020 by JMS

 Q3741 Polishing a Bell  This attached bell is from my great grandfather’s logging company and is dated 1878. It is outside and I want to polish it. I think it is brass, but I am not sure. Any recommendations on what to use?   [Click on image for larger version.] Posted Sunday, April 19, 2020 by Tom   Post a Reply  Email a reply

A. In the "Search Archived Q&A's" box at left, in the "By Question Number" box, put in 2110 and/or 2063 to see questions about restoring/polishing bells. These big bells are almost never brass; higher quality bells tend to have been made of "bell metal" (an alloy of bronze, see Link 1). I would suggest getting a roof over it, or acid rain will damage it over time, and the weather is going to work against any polishing you may do. Congratulations on having it, what a fabulous family heirloom!!!  Link 1  Link 2  Posted Monday, April 20, 2020 by JMS

A. Good discussion right in this Railroadiana Online site, see Link 1.  Link 1  Posted Monday, April 20, 2020 by jms

A. Wow - That is a really beautiful bell! It is made even more special by the fact that your family has a direct connection to it. With some time, energy and basic tools you can restore it to a shiny "Like New" condition. I recently completed a full restoration of a PRR steam locomotive bell. You'll find the details on this site's home page ("A PRR Bell Restoration"). In that narrative is a link to a 14 minute YouTube video I made which includes a segment on how to restore a bell like yours. My guess is that once it is restored you'll want to display it indoors. Good luck with the project - I hope you'll post some photos of your restoration!  Link 1  Posted Thursday, April 30, 2020 by Pete In Orlando

 Q3740 Conductor Lantern  I acquired this lantern a couple of months ago. I finally got some time to clean it up. Sold as a C T Ham lantern. During cleaning process I could not find a single mark on the lantern anywhere, not even the fuel cup holder. The only mark is on the burner thumb wheel. That is marked E Miller Meriden Conn. I looked at a Ham catalog online and found 3 lanterns that were close to this in construction. All had a different finial design/shape and all appeared to have holes in the finial. This finial is close to a ball in shape and has no holes. Ham wasn't the only one making these lanterns. Is there any clue that it is Ham or a clue that it is another manufacturer? Or is the best thing to say is it could be a Ham lantern?   [Click on image for larger version.] Posted Sunday, April 19, 2020 by Drew   Post a Reply  Email a reply

A. I simply have not had time to try to research this, but on page 72 of "Illustrated Encyclopedia of Railroad Lighting Vol. 1 The Railroad Lantern" (Barrett and Gross) there is a depiction of an Armspear No. 4 (ARM-4) that looks suspiciously like yours. I'm not saying this is it; I simply can't get through the rest of the book, and I hope you can figure it out. I looked through the Ham section and indeed, there is nothing that could be the same as yours. Good luck !  Posted Wednesday, April 22, 2020 by jms

A. Thank you very much. I had forgotten about Armspear. Looked at the 1907 Armspear catalog here at Railroadiana and the hood is definitely the same. The lower combustion air intake is different though, my lantern having one row of holes and the 1907 catalog lantern having two rows. A tantalizing similarity. I will look into getting a copy of "Illustrated Encyclopedia of Railroad Lighting Vol. 1" and keep looking around to see what I can find out. Would be nice if I could pin it down as Armspear. Adlake and Ham are automatically thought of when looking at Conductor's lanterns, but Armspear and Handlan-Buck are forgotten. Now I wonder if during its history Handlan-Buck also made them? Drew Posted Thursday, April 23, 2020 by DAM

A. Unfortunately, most of the antique catalogs no longer exist and Barrett only printed what he could find. I noticed the different air intake the same as you but nothing else I found in the book was even close. Maybe the air intake design changed and yours is either earlier or later, or a holdover design from before the 1907 catalog, or ... Best of luck -! These early lanterns are so wonderful and yours looks like it is in superb condition. Congratulations !!!  Posted Wednesday, April 29, 2020 by jms

 Q3739 RR Sign  What does the R stand for? Other side is a W.   [Click on image for larger version.] Posted Tuesday, April 14, 2020 by FD   Post a Reply  Email a reply

A. Hello. Is the lamp just in the background, or was it attached to the sign?  Posted Tuesday, April 14, 2020 by RJMc

A. R ring bell W whistle Posted Tuesday, April 14, 2020 by DC

A. I don't recall ever having seen an 'R' sign, but there were a lot of 'RS' signs, for 'Resume Speed' after permanent slow orders.  Posted Wednesday, April 15, 2020 by RJMc

A. I believe this R/W sign is from the DL&W.  Posted Wednesday, April 15, 2020 by COD

A. With that helpful hint from COD, there is a DL&W Rule Book from 1958 available complete on the web (see Link.) At page 18 following all the other definitions it says: Letter Symbols Used As Signs G -Grade signal O -Train orders R -Ring S -Take siding or yard SS -Spring switch T -Telephone W -Whistle Z -Instructions govern Under "Use of Signals" on page 49, it says: "30. The engine bell must be rung when an engine is about to move, when running through tunnels, while approaching and passing public crossings at grade, when passing trains on adjacent tracks, when passing passenger stations and along streets of towns and cities. 31. The whistle must be sounded at all places where required by rule or law, and to prevent accidents. 32. The unnecessary use of either the whistle or the bell is prohibited." There are no pix of the signs in the book, but this certainly supports DC's comment that this sign required the ringing of the bell (at least until the whole train passed the sign) for the trains going in one direction, and sounding the whistle as required for trains going the other direction. I suspect the combination of the two indications was just an artifact of the one particular location for this sign. The DL&W ran thru many heavily urbanized areas with both lots of grade crossings and lots of people who complained about train noise. So the signs helped the engineman figure out whether he was REQUIRED to make the noise, or FORBIDDEN to make the same noise at particular places.  Link 1  Posted Saturday, April 18, 2020 by RJMc

A. A couple of notes: it is a 1952 Rule Book in the link above, not 1958. The only significant difference that might make is that the 1952 version has all the steam-related rules still in it; they might already be gone from a 1958 version. Also, we can't be SURE the sign is from the DL&W. It might be, but other RR's might have the same procedures and it would be a RR-by-RR thing.  Posted Saturday, April 18, 2020 by RJMc

A. Part of the cast iron forms a large tongue at bottom that fits nicely into a slot in a wood or concrete post. This particular one has had a piece of pipe welded on to fit over that thin post that is beside it. Believe mine is from DL&W. Posted Sunday, April 19, 2020 by DC

A. Part of the cast iron forms a large tongue at bottom that fits nicely into a slot in a wood or concrete post. This particular one has had a piece of pipe welded on to fit over that thin post that is beside it. Believe mine is from DL&W. Posted Sunday, April 19, 2020 by DC

 Q3738 Some More Key IDs?  Thanks to all who responded to my last questions. Here are the next three keys, the CNR I assume to be Canadian National but the bit doesn't match their switch key cut. I do have a CNR C key and that cut is also unlike this key. Does anyone know the purpose of this CNR key? Next another CWRR Bohannon S on back. Finally the CNRY large serif letters on the front and large serif S on back. I have seen several of the identical key and each had a different name. Hope someone can help with these 3 keys. Thanks.   [Click on image for larger version.] Posted Monday, April 6, 2020 by Jim   Post a Reply  Email a reply

A. Sorry, just thoughts and not much help. CWRR could be California Western but I could not find a picture of an identified key to compare. CNRY: "RY" suggests electric, but if you've seen identical keys except with different road markings I wonder if this is a fake. CNR: This was such a huge railroad, they surely must have used any number of bit cuts. Maybe this is one you just haven't seen before. Link 1 is two different CNR switch locks/keys, unfortunately we can't see the bits. Mitchell made more of the later keys, apparently. C (car) key bits were made with different bit cuts, no matter which road.  Link 1  Posted Wednesday, April 8, 2020 by jms

A. The American Switch Keys Directory shows the exact pattern for No. 2 as C & W for Chesapeake and Western. Since the RR dropped the "&" in 1901, I suspect the key is for the more recent Chesapeake Western, altho it seems to have been a RailWAY ever since 1901.  Posted Wednesday, April 8, 2020 by RJMc

A. RJMc, Good find, and you are absolutely right - my copy of the book has the illustration at the top of page 5 and it's the same exact cut. I missed it somehow. With the cut as complicated as it is, this HAS to be Chesapeake Western. (Note there is a Chesapeake Western bit cut shown on page 8 - totally different.) Jim, Link 1 is some history about the CW, if you do not have it. Because of the style of the key (and this is just a GUESS) I am guessing it was made not very long after the & was dropped, and the attention was on THAT, so much so that changing the R to a Y slipped by whoever set up the dies (or maybe even by the railroad employee who did the ordering). This is an early 1900s key style.  Link 1  Posted Saturday, April 11, 2020 by jms

 Q3737 US&S Signal info?  I cannot find any information about this signal. When produced? Who used them? Even a photo in real life would be great. I cannot find anything. Any help would be great. Thank you   [Click on image for larger version.] Posted Sunday, April 5, 2020 by Dave   Post a Reply  Email a reply

A. I think you have one form of a 'Switch Position Indicator Signal." It only needs the two lights to indicate whether the track switch position is normal or reversed. See Link 1 for a good description of the functions of various kinds with pix of both main line and yard uses. My first impression from your particular signal is it was probably to indicate the status of a main line spring switch -- this impression is based on the use of regular heavy-duty signal sizes and qualtiy. See Link 2 for a lot of discussion about spring switches. In the one I particularly recalled, in a mainly single-track route the RR had installed about 2 miles of double track with a spring switch at each end to create a passing track. A train entering from either end was routinely directed to the right-hand track (as viewed from its own engine) and did not have to stop to either line itself in, or close the seitch back after passing over it, or to exit from the other end because the 'spring' part of the switch there let it out. BUT as indicated in the link, once the train started passing over the other spring switch (at the far end) it could NEVER back up without manually throwing and locking the switch or a derailment resulted as different parts of the train tried to use both tracks at once.  Link 1  Link 2  Posted Sunday, April 5, 2020 by RJMc

A. In Link 1 above, the sixth pic in the article looks like your model signal, installed on a main line spring switch, probably somewhere in the western U.S..  Posted Sunday, April 5, 2020 by RJMc

A. Looking at the 'image info' for that #6 pic shows "Atsf/Albuquerque/2ndDistrict/PintaSouthSprSw/". Signals in this style were used as early as the 1920's and are still in use today.  Posted Sunday, April 5, 2020 by RJMc

A. This does appear to be a switch indication light. While this US&S style is one I have never worked on , it is somewhat similar to the GRS ones we had in the yard . The GRS ones were double sides but did the same job. The longer hoods were different , as the ones I worked with had shorter hoods since the crews were close to the switches , and the longer hoods would have blocked their vision of its indication.  Posted Monday, April 6, 2020 by hvcoll

A. Just to fill in the details, the ATSF Historical Society has track charts for all, or almost all, of the Santa Fe system available online. So "Pinta" turns out to be Pinta, AZ, on the double-tracked Santa Fe Transcon main line between Gallup, NM, and Winslow, AZ. The track chart (for 1992) confirms there were spring switches there which let trains in and out of 'lap sidings' which were probably used to let faster trains overtake and pass slower trains, and the pic in Link 1 above confirms they used your type of signal there.  Posted Thursday, April 9, 2020 by RJMc

 Q3736 Globe Restoration  Many years ago I bought on old railroad lantern with a red globe in a misc. box of tools at an auction. It was dirty and had sat in that muddy old wooden box through several winters. In cleaning it up, I disassembled it and washed the glass in warm soapy water. To my great disappointment, as I washed the inside of the globe the red began to lift away and flake off the glass. So, all these years it's been just a clear globe. Is there any way to properly re-flash the globe red again without making one bad mistake worse?  Posted Sunday, April 5, 2020 by Sam   Post a Reply  Email a reply

A. "Flashing" is a skim layer(s) of colored glass over clear. See Link 1. It's glass, any kind of restoration would require a professional glass person. It's not a home repair like paint. (I don't know your expertise level - are you sure it was not paint? Sometimes these get painted!) However, I would really wonder how glass, unless it had encountered some weird condition that compromised it (overheating?), would wash off in a normal hand washing type of situation. My experience with flashed glass is that it will chip around edges, and probably could be scratched off, but I've never had it come off washing in soap and water. I hope someone else can shed some light on this.  Link 1  Posted Sunday, April 5, 2020 by jms

A. I think jms is right, it was probably paint. Never heard or seen a flashed globe loose it's color and I have many Dietz #40s red and blue and Embury Traffic Gards in my collection.There are paints for glass as I used amber on a clear globe and it came out pretty good. Just search "paint for glass" and you'll find your red glass paint. Posted Monday, April 6, 2020 by LC

A. In the 'good old days' people used 'bulb dye' -- a form of paint that came in small bottles -- on clear light bulbs to make red or amber lamps for cars and trucks. Your local auto parts store might still carry it. Other sources may be specialty stores dealing in stained glass and/or the art/hobby/craft stores such as Frank's. If you go this way, you really need to think it thru first to hope to get a uniform layer of color. Unless that globe is marked in some unusual way, I would really suggest just going on the web and buying a different red globe. They are commonly available both new and used. They were expendable items on the RR that got broken and replaced all the time. And almost every model of hand lantern ever used on a RR had many different colors of globes used at different times and places, so there would be nothing wrong or unusual if your lantern just keeps its now-clear globe. Posted Monday, April 6, 2020 by RJMc

A.  In the past 60 years the only time I have seen flashing come free was near the top and bottom edges where there was a chip. and all were very small . I agree with the others that this was probably not flashed but painted.  Posted Monday, April 6, 2020 by hvcoll

 Q3735 Replica Plate Info?  I recently bought this BLW replica plate from an on-line auction site. The seller had no information about it, other than he'd acquired it at an estate sale. I've never seen examples or images of vintage BLW plates, so I don't know if, for example: 1) A railroad preservation group/historical society arranged to have a few castings made from an original plate (as a fund raiser, for instance?), or 2): Was it fabricated as a 'fantasy' object, meant to appear like a historical artifact with decorative appeal? Did there ever exist a BLW #4906 built in 1879? Any information (good, bad or indifferent!) would be appreciated. Thanks for your time & Regards.   [Click on image for larger version.] Posted Sunday, April 5, 2020 by Chris   Post a Reply  Email a reply

A.  Let us know what the diameter of this is? And also is there any evidence on the back of it of wear around the bolt holes or old paint residue? Posted Monday, April 6, 2020 by KM

A.  A search turns up a post on Worthpoint which shows the same plate. The locomotive was from the Kahului Railroad in Hawaii and it was an 0-4-2. I am not sure if the engine still exists. The Worthpoint description says that the plate there was appraised and thought to be an original, but it does note in the description that the appraiser said replicas had been made. I was not able to copy the link for the Worthpoint post.  Posted Monday, April 6, 2020 by KM

A.  There is a glitch here and the Webmaster has been notified. On some search engines many of the words from the previous reply are not showing up. If you hit the "Post A Reply " button then you will be able to see all of the reply. Posted Monday, April 6, 2020 by KM

A. >>>> Gentlemen: Knew I'd forgotten something! The plate's 7 1/4" in diameter, 1/4" thick, and weighs between 3 and 3 1/2 lbs. Also, no evidence of wear around the bolt holes on rear of plate. Will send a photo of plate's obverse shortly.....Chris Posted Monday, April 6, 2020 by Chris

A. Here is a photo of the back. No damage noted to the rear bolt holes, but it appears some steel wool/other abrasive material has been applied above the hole on left side of plate (that lighter area you see). No other age-related wear noted. Link 1  Posted Monday, April 6, 2020 by Chris

A. >>> Gentlemen: A web search on "1879 0-4-2 locomotive" brought up a Bonhams auction site, detailing the sale of a loco built by BLW in 1879 for service on Maui on the sugar cane plantations. An auction photo shows the loco sporting an Extra Order plate from January 1927. Thanks to KM for unearthing the Hawaiian connection and the info on replica plates, which would explain how I wound up with one. Thanks again!.....Chris Posted Wednesday, April 8, 2020 by Chris

 Q3734 Bell ID?  I was hoping you can give me some insight on where this bell may originate from… It’s got the number 102S12 on the top.... Any insight would be appreciated!   [Click on image for larger version.] Posted Sunday, April 5, 2020 by Craig   Post a Reply  Email a reply

A.  What is the size of this bell? Measure it at the top and at the widest point of the mouth of the bell. My opinion is that this bell came from a building and not a locomotive. I am basing that on several things. The whole bell and mount are painted red. There are four horizontal lines that appear to have been cut into the bell after it was cast and I have not seen any locomotive bells with those. The mount has two different places where bolts can be installed in the base and at the right angle on the side. See the link below for a discussion from The American Bell Association website "Large Bell Forum" about decorative lines that are cast into brass bells. Maybe you can post an inquiry there about your bell. Link 1  Posted Monday, April 6, 2020 by KM

A. The bell is 17" across at the bottom and from top to bottom its 12" Posted Monday, April 6, 2020 by CAP

A. Any idea what the numbers and letters mean at the top of the bell - '102S12' Posted Monday, April 6, 2020 by CAP

A. Cast-in numbers like that are usually the pattern number for the mold used to cast the part (which then also serves as a part number during the manufacturing process.) So a lot of items are likely to have the same numbers.  Posted Monday, April 6, 2020 by RJMc

A. To be more correct, the numbers are the ID of the PATTERN -- often made of wood -- that is put into the mold and packed in sand, and then the pattern is removed, leaving the cavity to receive the molten metal that becomes the part. The pattern has the raised ID numbers on its surface so that the casting automatically carries the pattern number.  Posted Monday, April 6, 2020 by RJMc

A. I'm not a bell guy but I see rust on the edges at the bottom of the bell. I thought all steam engine RR bells were bronze or brass. Posted Tuesday, April 7, 2020 by LC

A. Its fair to say that bronze and brass were the preferred materials for bells, but cast iron and steel were used. In the US, during WWII when copper alloys were scarce and rationed, "war baby" engines such as the NKP 700 S2-series Berkshires were delivered with steel bells. Various diesels have also had them.  Posted Wednesday, April 8, 2020 by RJMc

 Q3733 China ID?  I'm trying to identify this railroad pattern china. Looks like the letters are S P L C. I know this is Syracuse china and is the Kennebec pattern (Used by a Maine railroad). Any help appreciated.   [Click on image for larger version.] Posted Sunday, April 5, 2020 by TB   Post a Reply  Email a reply

A. Sorry, but this is not Kennebec pattern (Link 1) which is well documented in the books and for sale by several online sellers. It's admittedly difficult to make out the letter order, but it does look like "C" is the last one - I'm guessing it may stand for "Club." You might try the Restaurant Collectors Network (Link 2), they have amassed a huge encyclopedia of china markings. This pattern is not in any of the railroad china books. Don't be fooled by someone telling you it's "railroad china," which seems to be becoming a generic term for any heavyweight china. This is like saying "Kleenex" for "Facial tissue" and "Scotch tape" for "cellophane tape."  Link 1  Link 2  Posted Sunday, April 5, 2020 by jms

A. The proper old term always was "hotel" grade china, but has been termed "restaurantware" in recent times for convenience since the subject covers many users and several actual body weights. "Vitrified" or vitreous are other terms used by manufacturers of these products. I personally have some doubts as to a small "C" being used for Club...more likely Company, even without the added "o". Here it is interlocked only with the "S", suggesting it might follow that letter. So the order might place the extra large "L" before P, S, and thence c. There is nothing here to rule out an undocumented rail or rail-related pattern, but neither is there anything to suggest or support one so far. Narrowing the date of the backstamp may help eliminate things that can't fit. Posted Saturday, April 11, 2020 by ShastaRoute

A. Just a hunch, but might check into the Puget Sound Lumber Company which may have been based in San Francisco circa 1897, and then in Oakland and east bay later. Some lumber operations did have china for offices and other uses (camps, hotels, outfit cars), and could have controlled a logging train operation further north. Few are known to have owned passenger-type cars though. [Not sure if this is the same company which had a mill site in Tacoma up to fire #2 in 1930.] Posted Monday, April 13, 2020 by ShastaRoute

A. I had a heavyweight china plate marked Sperry. I contacted the Sperry rail services company and they told me that they did indeed have china for their crews. You never know what is what until you follow through with research. Posted Sunday, May 17, 2020 by JN

A. Q. 1388 relates to some of the "Sperry" marked finds. I added some notes a while back. If there's more to the story please add what you find. Posted Tuesday, May 19, 2020 by ShastaRoute

 Q3732 NYC Lamp Question  I have a NYCRR caboose lantern with three yellow and one red lens. Is this normal and what kind of oil did they burn? Did the flame color effect the color of the final light? Thank you.  Posted Sunday, March 29, 2020 by RJD   Post a Reply  Email a reply

A. See prior q'S 3476 and 2881 for a lot of discussion on marker light lens colors, including markers that used 3 yellows and one red on several different major RR's. Most of these burned regular kerosene, same as was used in the hand lanterns. Yes, the flame color was factored into the lens colors to make sure the final light was a distinguishable color. The RR's and the glass industry did extensive research and development and set very rigorous standards to deal with that issue. Entering 'glass colors' (no quotes) in the word or phrase search box brings up prior Q's 3366, 2899, and 2670, and there are others, where the issue has been extensively discussed on the site here.  Posted Sunday, March 29, 2020 by RJMc

A. See Link 1 for a complete 1930 Erie Railroad Rule Book ( a great resource to answer all kinds of questions!). A series of 8 pix/diagrams start on page 34, all showing the proper uses of markers and classification lights using only red and yellow lens colors.  Link 1  Posted Saturday, April 18, 2020 by RJMc

 Q3731 More Key IDs?  Thanks to RJMc and JMS on my previous keys. Here goes with the next 3. The Tapered C&A has a straight drop bit and doesn't have a a designation letter at the customary 6 o'clock position such as an S or a C for switch or car. Could it be Chicago and Alton or Chicago and Atlantic? Hopefully some one knows. The C&I I was told was Camden and Indiana but since I have seen other C&I Fraim keys with a completely different bit cut. So I wonder if the C&I had an early cut switch key and at some time in history changed locks and keys to completely different cut? The CW -- well I'm not completely convinced it's even legit. but Over the years I have seen others with varying degrees of pocket wear. Thanks for any help I can get.   [Click on image for larger version.] Posted Monday, March 23, 2020 by Jim   Post a Reply  Email a reply

A. My immediate guesses, and I emphasize guesses, might be Camden and Amboy for No. 1; I think you mean CAMBRIA and Indiana for No. 2, and Chesapeake Western (of Virginia) comes to mind for No. 3. Notes: I do have an Atlantic and Great Western -- another broad-gauge predecessor of the Erie RR System -- key which doesn't look like the C&A key in either size, style, or cut, but the letter stamping font looks almost identical. That would be a little support for the Chicago and Atlantic possibility. The No. 3 key struck me immediately as being the same pattern as the Western Maryland used. The Chesapeake Western shortline was never closely related to WM, though.  Posted Monday, March 23, 2020 by RJMc

A. The lettering on the C&A RR key, the spacing of the letters, is exactly like what you see on the older Chicago & Alton tapered switch keys. Posted Tuesday, March 24, 2020 by DA

A. RE: CWRY - try Carolina Western , see Link 1, this assumes the auction consignor was correct. That key has a maker stamp and number. Your key is a Slaymaker based on the shape. There is a C&I that appears to have the same cut as yours in the Johnson book, but called "unknown." That is all I have.  Link 1  Posted Wednesday, April 1, 2020 by JMS

 Q3730 Tag ID?  The photos show a baggage tag that I found while metal detecting. It was found in a field in western New York state where a house once stood. The house has been gone for over 100 years. I know that it is from the New York Central RR and am interested to know what 'WAY' stands for. It is generally a RR station, but I have been unable to determine the identity of this one. Thanks.   [Click on image for larger version.] Posted Monday, March 23, 2020 by Mark S   Post a Reply  Email a reply

A. The Official Guide to the Railways publications have a comprehensive station name listing in the back, showing place name, state, RR('s) serving that place, and the table numbers for the schedules when/if passenger trains stopped there. Several historical Guides have been scanned and now are available (complete!over 1200 pages each!) on CD's for very handy reference. I have one for 1910 and one for 1945. Neither of them shows just a 'WAY' as a station on any of the NYC lines. However the 1910 one does show Wayneport, NY (a few miles east of Rochester) as being on the West Shore Railroad route (still called out separately, altho long since a part of the overall NYC operations) and the 1945 one lists it as a location in three different schedules but doesn't have trains stopping there -- probably because the 'great steel fleet' of passenger trains all went by on the former NYC & HR main line side. Checking on the web turns up some outstanding pix of NYC steam, a huge coaling facility, and even an icing station all located at Wayneport (see Link). The somewhat abbreviated format of this tag suggests to me it was associated with the servicing operations, for example an employee ID tag or a tool ID tag, rather than regular baggage handling. There were also NYC stations at Wayne, MI, and Wayne, OH, but the Wayneport one seems much more likely.  Link 1  Link 2  Posted Tuesday, March 24, 2020 by RJMc

A. Might there have been a reason to secure " Waybills" in a satchel? Posted Wednesday, March 25, 2020 by ShastaRoute

A. Hello all, Here's some info from an old retired RR guy (me) that may shed some light on your "WAY" brass tag. All railroads used way or peddler cars, as we called them, to ship materials from the storekeeper out to various gangs and crews along the "way" or down the line and the materials in these cars all had tags with order numbers on them. Of course, my era used serial numbered paper or cardboard tags but you can surmise that brass tags were used early on. We sent these tags back via company mail showing the date and signature received. Each time we received a peddler car, we unloaded what was ours and then re-sealed the car with a standard metal locking seal. Eventually, the way cars were replaced by storekeeper trucks or material was delivered direct from the supplier by truck or rail in the case of large items. I hope this provides a possible answer to your questions. DJB  Posted Thursday, March 26, 2020 by DJB

A. Although the 'shipment receipt' idea is possible, see prior Q 3683 for a very similar NYC RR tag marked "WKN" also found in NY State; we speculate that that one is for "Weehawken" -- also a major NYC terminal on the former West Shore part of the NYC system. The similarity of the two makes me think more strongly that these are employee ID tags from the days long before laminated paper or plastic came into use.  Posted Thursday, March 26, 2020 by RJMc

A. Thankyou for the responses. The only observation I would make in relation to it being a tool or employee ID tag is that don' those usually have a round hole? Whereas this one has the same elongated hole, which is the same size as other baggage tags I have. Posted Thursday, March 26, 2020 by Mark S.

A. Looking at both photos, the letters appear properly aligned and spaced. But only in the octagonal tag here are the numbers rather jumbly. It could be either a replacement for a damaged or lost tag, or an extension of an existing sequence beyond the last tag or the original set. In either case, a blank already having the letters was available, with only the numbers to be added. This would suggest there was a master list, probably at an office in a centralized location...railroads were not sloppy organizations, they kept tight controls over numbers out of necessity. Given that this number is up beyond 4000, it would have to be one major complex for this to be a sequential employee identification. I'm not ready to buy into that idea so easily. It seems like a tag for something that was handled in large numbers and had to be accounted for regularly...sort of like handling all those milk cans or mail pouches etc.. Materials (as noted), papers, vouchers, receipts and the like all had to be collected from far away points and brought to the people responsible for keeping the numbers, all heading toward central control for accounting and tracking...no computers in those days. But the numbers can't be so big that the tags become useless. So rather than individual scraps, some kind of pouches or lots are being moved under these control numbers. The letters would define the useage or the point from which these parcels are sent, and the latter seems less likely to me. Pure conjecture on my part. Posted Saturday, March 28, 2020 by ShastaRoute

A. All that said, and good thinking, use of the tag to mark shipments is a good possibility. As to ID tags, I suspect that the major use of an employee tag at that time, in addiition to gate access, would be for timekeeping and payroll purposes. The assigned number would have to work in the bookkeeping system; for that reason any kind of number would work. It's highly doubtful that the NYC System had centralized payroll in the 1920's or '30's, so a 4,000 number would work in a facility that looks as big as Wayneport, and which had to work 24/7 with lots of folks. (Still speculating, of course.) Also see prior Q 3228 for a paper PRR 'Temporary Gate Pass - pending issuance of ID badge.' which is likely from the '30s or '40's. Not known what the permanent pass or badge would have looked like.  Posted Saturday, March 28, 2020 by RJMc

A. Even though Hudson River in not in the initials here, looking back to the 1893 OG, West Albany is noted as a station. Any chance WAY is code for a "West Albany Yard" designation? Posted Saturday, March 28, 2020 by ShastaRoute

A. Q703 had an earlier tag marked WAY under the line's initials. Posted Saturday, March 28, 2020 by ShastaRoute

A. Interesting that the tag in Q 703, in the one pic available, doesn't say 'Albany'; also it is not numbered, and per the comments a couple entries above, its punched with both an oblong and a round hole. So ???.  Posted Sunday, March 29, 2020 by RJMc

A. Supposedly said "Albany" only on back (not pictured). The tag was found in area of that line which ran eastward and became a component of the main N.Y.C.R.R. (later adding Hudson River). If the A&B name was kept in use as one of the subsidiaries, then in time Albany could be a destination for some dedicated regular traffic or shipments (or the name of the shipper..think of embossed names on milk cans before all that info. went onto the paper tags in later days). We don't know yet what WAY was, but West Albany became a major yard/shop/office complex. The lack of numbers may simply be related to the method of tracking in an earlier era, but the system of tags may have lasted from metal on through to paper tags fixed by wire. For milk, as an example, by the time of paper both the shipper and processor were named on the tags which probably cut down on the need for embossed cans as you knew who it had to go back to. Not to say these tags are specifically milk, but something of the same idea. As we only have bits and pieces so far, it's definitely non-conclusive. Posted Monday, March 30, 2020 by ShastaRoute

A. Also should point out, with the info. from Mark S. this tag could be from the original NYCRR, making it very old. Yes, the holes on the other tag leave a lot of questions along with that break or slit across the top left side. Posted Monday, March 30, 2020 by ShastaRoute

A. This is a real learning experience. Thankyou. This is what I enjoy about the metal detecting hobby. Not just finding items but learning about them. Learned a lot about RR history from the other tags I found. This one is topping them. For as much as is known it appears there is still a lot of unknown. Wish I could add something more to the discussion. The location of the find was about 15 miles SW of Attica, NY.  Posted Monday, March 30, 2020 by Mark S

A. The A&B alignment was used for about 10 years before the route was shifted. The old alignment was sold off to Erie-related predecessors and changed to wide gauge. A&B in name (the corporate shell) had gone into another merger company which was itself folded into the NYCentral parent. Of course, legal names sometimes survive the original useage (as a road) to be held for other reasons beyond a public face (equipment trusts, etc.). The locations of both found tags seem to be close to the original operating territory and may point to that early era. How Albany or West Albany might tie in would take some deep research unless someone is a real hound of Central history with quick answers. And another question comes to mind..Did they use the term "Waycar" as a norm in this region & for that era? Posted Tuesday, March 31, 2020 by ShastaRoute

 Q3729 Mystery Plate  I am wondering about this brass plate that I bought on eBay a few years ago. It measures approximately 8 in. x 4 in. x 1/4 in. It is basically flat although it does have a very slight warp from the bottom left corner to the top right corner. There is one drop of overflow paint on the back and it appears to be Tuscan red. I have no idea what it came from. Does anyone have any ideas? Thanks.   [Click on image for larger version.] Posted Tuesday, March 17, 2020 by Pete   Post a Reply  Email a reply

A. This (Link 1) mentions the blowers in the text along with the other components...something not included in other write-ups. "Energized" kind of screams electric. Tuscan red sound like Pennsylvania. So GG1 might be something to look into. Link 1  Posted Thursday, March 19, 2020 by ShastaRoute

A. Right...almost certainly off an electric locomotive based on 'energized.' And mention of transformers means one using alternating current, either direct from the power supply (as GG-1's did) or converted from direct current on board. All electric (and diesel electric) locomotives must have powerful traction motor blowers (fans) to move the waste heat out and keep the motors and auxiliary componetns from burning up. The blowers are typically among the LOUDEST parts of all-electric locomotives -- the electric motors themselves are almost silent, and the blower noise can be quite annoying. So this plate was on a locomotive where the engineer could shut off the blowers, and obviously if he did that at some times damage would result, hence the plate. I don't think any modern electric locomotive design takes that risk of allowing manual control; all the blowers are now under automatic control. So I suspect this is from an earlier generation unit. PRR had probably 10 different models of electrics in addition to GG-1's and some other lines used AC traction, including some of the interurbans which moved freight, so there are various possibilities to be looked into. The PRR Power book lists all the PRR different electric models but has only one in-cab photo and of a GG-1; no plate is visible in that one pic.  Posted Thursday, March 19, 2020 by RJMc

A. Thank you ShastaRoute and RJMc for your thoughtful comments. I've had the plate for a few years. As I recall, the seller had found it at an antique flea market. The trail went cold at the point. The casting is rather interesting with some of the letters inconsistent and misaligned. I gave the brass letters a light polishing but otherwise left the plate undisturbed. It hangs in my train room in a frame I made from wood and granite. I think it is a pretty interesting piece. I suspect that it is likely off of an early generation electric locomotive. That one drop of paint does suggest the PRR as a possibility. I previously did some GG-1 research and came to the same dead end as RJMc - we likely found the same photo. I'm optimistic that someone on this site might have some additional ideas. I'm grateful for everyone's time and consideration!  Posted Thursday, March 19, 2020 by Pete

A. At this point I suggest no more chemicals come in contact. There are guys who have taken genuine paint samples from equipment of the past. (Pre-war paints could differ from post-war.) It is possible a preserved flake from PRR tuscan has been stashed somewhere and could be compared. Seems like a giant bother, but how many of these plates could exist. The trick is finding the right guy, who hopefully is still alive and kicking. Posted Thursday, March 19, 2020 by ShataRoute

A. What area was the plate found in? Posted Friday, March 20, 2020 by RJMc

A. Another thought: a lot of undergroung mine RR's also used electric locomotives.  Posted Friday, March 20, 2020 by RJMc

A. Also, beginning around 1915 and up thru the mid-1950's, Norfolk and Western and the Virginian Ry. between them had over 300 miles of electrified heavy-duty RR running 11,000 V overhead AC traction, and quite a few electric freight locos. Posted Saturday, March 21, 2020 by RJMc

A. I'm very grateful for the additional comments. The idea of the paint analysis, Shasta Route, is intriguing. As per your recommendation I have no intention of doing any further cleaning or restoration on the plate. I do agree that this could be a rather rare find. I'm sorry, RJMc, but I honestly don't recall where in the United States this plate was found by the seller. Your thoughts on other electric locomotive possibilities is noted and appreciated. Thank you!  Posted Saturday, March 21, 2020 by Pete

A. I am pretty sure that this plate is from a New Haven electric locomotive. I have had plates like this in stock over the years and they have come in with other New Haven plates. I hope this helps!  Posted Thursday, April 9, 2020 by RJM

 Q3728 Sign Question  I found this cast iron sign next to an old abandoned main line near a rail overpass bridge in Jacksonville, Illinois. Any idea what it might possibly be for? It's obviously not a milepost marker. A lot of railroads had main lines running through the town, including the CB&Q, C.A., N&W, and M.&O., and the sign may have been near the city limits 75 or 100 years ago. Thanks,   [Click on image for larger version.] Posted Thursday, March 12, 2020 by Larry   Post a Reply  Email a reply

A. Hello Larry, Having retired from a major railroad after 40 yrs,I can tell you that your cast iron sign was more than likely a bridge or culvert inventory marker.These typically had the mile post number and one more digit indicating the tenth of a mile,showing where this structure was located.These would have been consecutive climbing numbers starting at zero from a major terminal or junction point.Lets see who else may have another explanation for you. DJB Posted Friday, March 13, 2020 by DJB

A. If ? You can take this off the mounting post there may be some RR markings on the inside this is a nice find  Posted Sunday, March 15, 2020 by Santafeboy

A. As Larry discusses above, I also strongly suspect the marker indicates 215.5 miles from somewhere. That same numbering method was used for signal ID number plates also, so similar numbers would show up on block signals in that vicinity. Using Bing Maps 'measure distance' it is easy to see that Jacksonville is 190 air line miles from Chicago, 215 miles from Indianapolis, and about 215 from Kansas CIty. Any of those are good candidates for the zero point on their mile marker series. It should be fairly easy to determine which RR's mileposts hit 215 around Jacksonville.  Posted Sunday, March 15, 2020 by RJMc

A. The Official Guide of the Railways for March, 1945, in the passenger timetable for the Alton Railroad line between Chicago and Kansas City shows Jacksonville, IL at Milepost 215.8 from Chicago. (The Burlington and Wabash MP's for the town are way different.) The remaining question is what the "D" stands for. Since there was a three-way junction in the town, near the Alton depot, I suspect the D may have been for 'diamond' to mark where the intersecting tracks crossed. Diamonds always were (and are) a major high-maintenance fixture in the track and would merit special marking. An Alton track chart would help answer the question but track charts are much harder to come by than the digitized Official Guides.  Posted Sunday, March 15, 2020 by RJMc

A. This is what is commonly known (now that I recall) as a "D Plate" which was associated with a "Distant Signal." See prior Q 3684 which is about a similar "A Plate" but that one did not include any mile info. The D Plate adds specific meanings to the color lights displayed in t the associated signal head. The brackets (barely visible in the pic) attached the D Plate to the signal mast which also carried the light heads.  Posted Monday, March 16, 2020 by RJMc

A. The explanation for the D letter on this cast iron sign does not stand for Distant Signal.The D designation is a relatively new rule from maybe 15-20 years ago and started showing up on railroads and in their rulebooks to denote a fixed signal that functioned as an approach signal to an interlocker location and was mainly used on rail lines that did not have a signal system in use such as ABS,APB or CTC.The D signal was used on the mast of the these signals without an accompanying mile board number plate.I worked in the signal department and was governed by the GCOR which was used by several Midwest railroads jointly. Going back to the original cast iron sign in question,on a railroad that had lines that ran parallel for some distance after leaving a common zero mileboard starting location,they would place a letter ahead of or over the mile on the number plate that designated a particular subdivision, to eliminate confusion from having another identical milepost and tenth appearing elsewhere on the same railroad.I hope I am not confusing people,but having worked for a major railroad that used letters on some mileposts,that most likely explains the D on this sign. Comments ? DJB Posted Monday, March 16, 2020 by DJB

A. Thank all of you so much for sharing your expertise with me as I have had this cast iron sign for a many years and no one at any of the railroad shows around Chicago were able to give me any information about it. I was unable to get the sign off the post, as it is rusty and wouldn't budge (however, I had mentioned it to my dad and one of the plumbers at the KC's lent him a big pipe cutter and he presented the sign to me the next time I cam to visit), so I doubt if I would be able to get the sign off the post to look for markings. The milepost tenth of a mile as the fourth digit on the milepost marker seems to make a lot of sense, as well as the letter D indicating the division to distinguish a duplicate mile post marker. An old map of the C&A railroad shows one main line going south to Saint Louis from Bloomington, Illinois, and another going southwest from Bloomington, Illinois to Kansas City (this one goes through Jacksonville, Illinois), so the theory about duplicate mile post markers on different main lines of the same railroad appears to be right on point. The Alton Route passenger timetable showing Jacksonville at milepost 215.8 was a great supporting piece of evidence to indicate the sign is a milepost marker. Thanks again, you guys are the best!! Posted Monday, March 16, 2020 by Larry

A. I also sorted thru some of those possibilities. See Q 2896 on here where we deciphered "C's" and 'M's' on some other mile marker signs. Possibly coincidentally, those were off the B&O, which had a strong influence on practices on the Alton Railroad at the time period when a cast iron sign like this would have been installed. But there would be no reason to have a milepost accurate to one tenth of a mile unless something else very particular went on there. And the facts point to something signal-system related, where the four-digit system was most entrenched. I am trying to find an Alton employee timetable for a definitive answer to this.  Posted Monday, March 16, 2020 by RJMc

A. See the Link (also at: https://www.railroadsignals.us/rulebooks/rulebooks.htm ) for an OUTSTANDING collection of the signal sections of well over 100 (one hundred !!!) RR rulebooks, ranging from current back into the 1880's. This is part of a Railran Guide by Todd Sestero. Having gone thru many of them, and any I thought might relate to the Alton, the successor GM&O, or others such as B&O, the only signals that commonly have a 'D' as part of the indication were/are 'Detector' signals. Before train radios became common, a detector signal changed indications to alert an approaching crew that a wayside detector, usually a mile or more back, had detected a defect that required the crew to stop and nspect their train. Such detectors appear to have been in use by 1940 or earlier, so it is possible the Alton was using a Detector signal at Jacksonville, Il. at a time when cast iron plates were in vogue. We still need to get an Alton employee timetable or maybe a track chart (or better yet, an employee who operated on the line in those time periods or shortly thereafter) to be sure.  Link 1  Posted Tuesday, March 17, 2020 by RJMc

A. About the right distance from Jacksonville to Des Moines if a line ran between Posted Tuesday, March 17, 2020 by hvcoll

A. Silly question...if it is mileage then where is the decimal or why is the fourth number not in half-sized superscript? Posted Monday, March 30, 2020 by ShastaRoute

A. In signal numbering, where thousands of plates were being made to cover say, the Santa Fe route from Chicago to CA, they saved thousands of dollars by not putting in the decimal points and just having everybody understand the system. (I pleasantly recall looking at Milepost 1000 on that route, somewhare in eastern Colorado.) The number plate was really a unique identifier of the signal unit, and was never used as a distance benchmark. Mileposts, which did serve as benchmars, were almost always placed at the exact location to the nearest mile and so avoided this issue. Posted Monday, April 6, 2020 by RJMc

A. The 1952 DL&W rule book that turned up for Q 3739 under Rule 295 has a good pic of a signal mast with a "D" sign and the number plate directly under it. Om the DL&W the "D" illuminated, but the indication would be the same if the signal caused the train to stop and the rules or Special Instructions explained why.  Posted Saturday, April 18, 2020 by RJMc

A. And yet another possible twist to this. Illinois Central Gulf RR inherited the line thru Jacksonville. A 1974 ICG Missouri Division employee timetable turned up on the web (see link) showing Jacksonville at MP 215.5 with a "D" next to the station name. Looking thru another ICG timetable it explains "When placed in station column == D == indicates that train order office is only open at days and times specified in special instructions." And a lot of the stations had "D" in the 1974 timetable. A new guess is the signal with the D plate may have indicated whether the station was open or not, so as to know whether to expect train orders...still speculating. We need to find an employee who operated over this railroad to really confirm any of this.  Link 1  Posted Thursday, May 28, 2020 by RJMc

 Q3727 More Key IDs?  Here are the next three keys that I want to ID. The first two are simply C RR. There are many possibilities but hopefully someone will have an answer. The CE&W RY is a real mystery to me. I can find absolutely nothing with those initials. It's an old A&W hex key. I've had it for many years and have shown it to other collectors, but no one knows. Hopefully some one does.   [Click on image for larger version.] Posted Wednesday, March 11, 2020 by Jim   Post a Reply  Email a reply

A. Joseph Gross's Trolley and Interurban Directory shows the Cleveland, Elyria, & Western Ry electric interban being incorporated in Ohio in 1901 with 93 miles of track and being combined into the Cleveland Southwestern interurban system in 1902. I have a CSW&C(olumbus) key to the same pattern which also appears to be an Adlake hex, but it appears smaller than yours. A later CS Ry and Light lock uses a larger Adlake key, but with the bit on the other side of the key barrel. On the trolley and interurban side alone, Gross lists more than 10 CRR 's and another 20 or so CRy's.  Posted Thursday, March 12, 2020 by RJMc

A. A resource you may not be aware of is Google Books (not "Google"), which is a compendium of scanned in antique catalogs, reference books, directories, etc. Try searching on Link 1. It won't help with key cuts, but it will get you names for initials. I immediately found a number of references to the CE&W and history about it and its branches in an antique "Railway Journal." As RJMc says, there are dozens of potential CRR possibilities. A key with an identical bit cut to your first one sold on Railroad Memories a while ago, unfortunately with no railroad identification (Link 2). My experience tells me "RR" and "RY" often were used interchangeably, although more often than not "RY" likely turns out to be an interurban or trolley. And that "CO" can many times mean a non-RR company that bought a 'railroad grade' lock set to use for their business, which may have 'suspicious' initials suggestive of a rail line, but it was not.  Link 1  Link 2  Posted Saturday, March 14, 2020 by JMS

 Q3726 Cast Iron RR Pot Lamp  I acquired a cast iron pot w/ a screw top funnel and a rope wick with the raised markings: Santa Fe Route NO 5973. It's about 7 inches tall and about 4.5 inches diameter at bottom. Very heavy and solid Can you provide any info on this little beast? Thanks.  Posted Wednesday, March 4, 2020 by Mark D.   Post a Reply  Email a reply

A. A photo would help here. It sounds like you have a torch or a smudge pot. Check Q 2693 and Q 2510 in the Search By Question Number for more information. Is it round shaped like a ball or cylindrical?  Posted Thursday, March 5, 2020 by KM

 Q3725 Lantern Question  I bought a old lantern years ago -- a Handlan Wabash RR with a twist off font. It came with a short simplex handle burner. I have 2 questions: Did this lantern come with that burner or should it have another burner in it. Of course there is no opening for a drop in burner, long handle? My other question is: Did Handlan make a twist off font like this one shown in my picture? If so is this a rare lantern. I haven't seen any other one like this. Thank You.   [Click on image for larger version.] Posted Tuesday, March 3, 2020 by D   Post a Reply  Email a reply

A. The Link is to one of the 1918 Handlan catalog pages in the archives here on the RRiana Site. The Link shows the details of the font and twist-off base for the No. 176 lantern, which look to be the same as yours. I also have a lantern marked "The Handlan" on top (their quotation marks stamped into the top!) from the N.W. Pacific which has the same font arrangement; apparently it was pretty typical for Handlan. Further down in the 1918 catalog pages they have the No. 113 lantern, which they state to be the same body as the No. 176, but with batteries and an electric bulb fitted in place of the oil burner assy.  Link 1  Posted Thursday, March 5, 2020 by RJMc

A. The additional Link below shows the several pages in the 1918 catalog in the archives on this site. In 1918 Handlan offered lanterns with model nos. from 174 to 181, all generally similar to the 176, but the different model nos. came with different burner and wick raiser options but all using the twistoff base principle.  Link 1  Posted Saturday, March 7, 2020 by RJMc

 Q3724 Steam Whistle  I recently purchased a Buckeye Brassworks Dayton O. steam whistle. It is stamped with that name. Is there any way to tell if it is from a steam locomotive or something like a steam tractor or industrial steam engine? Based on the name and design, can you tell how old it is? I know the company was also known as the Buckeye Brass and Ironworks at one point. It has a brass lever to activate the whistle. Thanks,   [Click on image for larger version.] Posted Tuesday, March 3, 2020 by Mark   Post a Reply  Email a reply

A. It is hard to tell what size the whistle is from your photos. Take another picture and place a ruler or something else that gives us an idea of the size. Also measure the size of the steam inlet pipe on the bottom.  Posted Thursday, March 5, 2020 by KM

A. Here are new photos with measurements. Link 1  Posted Monday, March 9, 2020 by Mark

A. Thank you for sending in the photos. My opinion is that at 2.5 inches the whistle diameter is smaller than those used on locomotives. After looking at many photos of locos from around 1880 to 1890 the whistles appear to be larger diameter and many have multiple chimes. Your whistle is a single chime and the valve lever has that curved shape. Locomotive whistles usually have a straight valve lever which can be pulled by a rope which extends back into the cab and the rope is horizontal to the boiler top. My thought is that with the curved lever the mechanical advantage would be for the rope to pull straight down, and that makes me think that along with the small diameter, single chime and the curved lever that this whistle might have come from a building. But as I said, this is only my opinion and hopefully others will offer their thoughts. My experience is with locomotives that were built after WW1.  Posted Tuesday, March 10, 2020 by KM

A.  I have also attended about a dozen steam traction and hit or miss engine shows over the years. Most of the steam traction guys have placed larger whistles on their machines. If a steam tractor sat around the whistle was probably the first thing that got removed so when restoring them whistle replacement is necessary. At one show that I was at a guy had a Nathan five chime steam locomotive whistle on a 120 year old traction engine and the whistle was probably at least 70 years younger than the machine.  Posted Tuesday, March 10, 2020 by KM

A. tvrm349 Post subject: Re: Trying to identify steam whistle I inherited Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2016 7:37 am Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 11:07 am Posts: 32 "The whistle is definitely a Buckeye single note, made by the Buckeye Brass Works of Dayton, OH." "The most common of all single note whistles, literally thousands were made, applied to steam traction engines, portable steam engines, stationary boilers, etc." This is a post from 2016 in Railway Preservation News, Interchange Forum. There is a lot of discussion there about the difficulty in identification of whistles. The photos of the whistle in that question appear to be identical to yours, but the Buckeye name on that whistle may have been polished off at some time.  Posted Wednesday, March 11, 2020 by KM

A. Thank you for your response. I appreciate all the information. I know of another person with the same whistle. I will make sure he knows about this posting.  Posted Friday, March 20, 2020 by Mark

 Q3723 Key IDs Wanted  I've been collecting various railroad keys for over 40 years and during this time I've acquired quite a few that I have never been able to positively Identify. So I thought I would give your site a try. I'm trying 3 at a time starting with the letter A and moving through the alphabet. Now some might not be legitimate or railroad. If that is the case by all means let me know, although most are marked RR or RY. the first ASFCO is a Loffelholz, and I find no railroad with those initials. The back is marked Loffelholz and has a Milwaukee Road bit cut. The B&A has numerous possibilities but I can delete two of them: Boston and Albany and Bangor and Aroostock. The B&R is a straight Slaymaker and the only 2 roads listed on this site's database are Bennington and Rutland and Buffalo and Rochester. Both pre-date this key by many years. Now I can speculate or guess what they are so I'm really hoping for definitive answers. I thank anyone who can help me and will post 3 more keys soon.   [Click on image for larger version.] Posted Thursday, February 27, 2020 by Jim   Post a Reply  Email a reply

A. Hopefully someone will recognize one of these. But I am puzzled how you can eliminate any particular road, since just about every RR I have run into had more than one key in use for all the different functions: differenct divisions, switch keys, rip track, MoW, signal, and all usually had different bits, sometimes but not always with more ID for the less common uses, but almost all marked with the RR initials. Posted Thursday, February 27, 2020 by RJMc

A. RJMc You do have a good point. there are different cut keys for various departments where a key other than a switch key is used. also some roads when they merged with another road kept using the absorbed roads switch key bit style but marked for the absorbing roads initials. So you are correct I'm probably assuming too much without concrete evidence when I eliminate a road from an unknown (to me) switch key. thanks for your input now I just hope I get positive Input for an ID. Jim Posted Thursday, February 27, 2020 by Jim

A.  Have you thought about large companies that are not railroads, or that might have their own private plant railroad? What I am thinking about for ASF Co. is American Steel Foundry Co. which was in Granite City,Il near Saint Louis. I know there was a merger in 1902 and the name may have changed to ASF Companies. The other thing that bothers me about these keys is the lack of pocket wear on them, maybe they were not carried around by employees, just kept in some central location?  Posted Saturday, February 29, 2020 by KM

A. KM, Yes I did think the ASF CO key could possibly be non Railroad and did state in original question. American Steel Foundry could very well be where the key is from. I know that at times they receive train load of Iron ore from Minnesota and other areas. Possibly they had large yards for receiving these trains with their own switch locks and keys. As for lack of pocket wear. they could have been an employees spare key or new old stock and never issued out.Either way I do like pocket worn keys but that isn't always possible. thanks for your input. jim Posted Saturday, February 29, 2020 by Jim

A. It's difficult trying to identify a key seeing only one side of the bit cut - pics of both sides would give a much better opportunity. Indeed, Bangor & Aroostook used BAR, with no ampersand. And the B&R key is far too new to be Bennington & Rutland or Buffalo & Rochester. It is "possible" the B&A key could be Boston & Albany but it would have to be a "different" cut that hasn't been identified yet (?). Per a recent Key Lock & Lantern article (I believe that's where I saw it), Slaymaker in particular is known to have produced "overruns," legitimate RR-ordered keys that ended up being NOS, ordered but never used.  Posted Saturday, February 29, 2020 by JMS

A. The other B&A that springs to mind is Baltimore & Annapolis but I have yet to find any kind of documentation for what bit cuts were used. Please see Link 1 for an informative history. This line existed during the time period your key was made. It was a large enough line that keys and locks would not be "impossible" (like the Buffalo & Rochester which existed from 1850-1853 ...) With respect, could I make a suggestion for future pictures? - use a neutral color flat surface for the background. Even with enlargements, it's hard to make out bit cuts that "disappear" into complicated backgrounds like fabric. Use a wine cork or something to raise them off the surface of a piece of cardboard, or a similar arrangement.  Link 1  Posted Sunday, March 1, 2020 by JMS

A. JMS, I too thin the B&A is Baltimore and Annapolis seems Ike someone out there might have one and say it is indeed that road. I will use a more neutral background for upcoming photos thanks for your input. Jim Posted Sunday, March 1, 2020 by Jim

A. Jim, thank you -! The most frustrating thing is no RR company records existing to document anything... Re B&R... See Link 1, an Etsy seller is offering a "Bennington & Rutland" key. And Link 2 (Look in "Antiques & Collectibles") ? I bought an identical fake B&R key (he sold and I purchased as fake) for an article I wrote for the Railroadiana Express a few years ago. Looks like he is still in business, mixing authentic keys with "remakes" as he calls them, but no B&R keys offered at present.  Link 1  Link 2  Posted Monday, March 2, 2020 by JMS

 Q3722 Feather Pattern?  Here is an odd gravy boat from the Maddock Pottery Works marked Scammell Lamberton China and dating around 1926-30. Western Pacific's patterns are accounted for, but the Feather River Inn appears to be a black hole. Van Noy Interstate (becoming The Interstate Company) is known to have been running the services there. The walls of the dining room were originally decorated in a motif of large single feathers (part of the WPRR heritage). Interstate had ordered other china from the Maddock Works (in DOR by Luckin). Could this be one of the lost patterns of the Inn?   [Click on image for larger version.] Posted Tuesday, February 25, 2020 by ShastaRoute   Post a Reply  Email a reply

A. What a terrific piece, wonderful art and surely a keeper! Maybe Larry Paul's hotel research might possibly help (Link 1). Restaurant China Volume 2 (Barbara Conroy)information shows this bottom mark as a Scammell company mark and dates it at 1928-1930. Further info from the book: Thomas Maddock & Sons purchased the Lamberton Works when their City Pottery factory was destroyed by fire in 1921. They formed a separate company, Maddock Pottery Company, Lamberton Works, to operate their newly acquired plant. In 1901, David William Scammell, age 20, was hired as an office boy. He invested his earnings as he advanced in position until by 1921, he was company Vice-President. By 1923 he was the largest stockholder and together with his brothers, offered to purchase the Lamberton Works. The Maddocks eventually agreed and sold the firm and in 1924, the name was changed to the Scammell China Company. I have no information about the Inn, but this history would seem to me that this bottom marking is purely Scammell and not connected with any Interstate orders from Maddock, which would have happened before the Scammell Company's creation in 1924.  Link 1  Posted Wednesday, February 26, 2020 by JMS

A. Thanks for looking. Note 1: Larry is always scanning. This one has gone into his files, but it remains something undocumented..possibly no other parts of the set have yet surfaced to raise any eyebrows. Conroy has become a bit outdated, and Larry has revised the early use of this backstamp to circa 1926. Note 2: The driving force behind what became Interstate News Company, then became President of Van Noy Interstate (later just Interstate). The Van Noy's were going bye-bye with time. The Feather River Inn would have been an upscale destination, so common eating house patterns would have been unlikely. But going with a custom maker you already had a relationship with would make sense. And so.... Note 3: The Thomas Maddock & Son(s) fire (above) was in the early 1890's. The new Maddock Pottery Company's 1890's factory, aka Maddock Pottery Works (or Lamberton Works, if you prefer that) remained in operation continuously until the Scammell brothers bought it. The other part, Thomas Maddock's Sons was in the lucrative sanitary porcelain business (yes, toilets) and the costs from building a new plant in the 1920's is why they sold the Maddock Pottery Works to David et al. Old MPW patterns and shapes were still supplied to existing clients for re-orders, and new patterns and shapes were added. There was no break..same people, same business, same high quality custom work. Note 4: The lone feather does surface on matchbooks (later era when highways came in) for the inn..but clutched in the hands of their cute little rodent mascot. Not much pops up for the strictly rail era. The early dining room photo is on-line..so we have a big clue there. My own resources on Western Pacific are somewhat limited, but perhaps a collector out there may have found some early material on the inn. The lack of user or supplier marks is not too odd for pieces with small bases or on re-orders from older existing patterns. Maybe plates or bowls might show more. Posted Monday, March 2, 2020 by ShastaRoute

A. Another possibility, extremely remote, for a connection to the Western Pacific feather might be found in the interurban dining services of the Sacramento Northern Railway after WPRR had taken control away from a private licensee. The accounting of their Parlor Car services (Link 1) raises the question of what china may have been brought aboard around 1928-9. ICC documents (1935) relate how food was jointly supplied from WP's D.C. operations, but paid for separately by S.N.R., completely keeping in line with the parent company's distancing of the subsiary operations for expense and income purposes. However, I find no accessed report of known china for any of the predecessor organizations nor the joint S.N.Ry. itself. It is possible that WPRR could have ordered a pattern which implied their oversight of services but left out any names. Of course why use a feather for a train named Meteor or Comet? All dining was gone by the years of the mid-Depression. Anyone seen other patterns for S.N.R.?? Link 1  Posted Saturday, April 11, 2020 by ShastaRoute

 Q3721 Lantern Burner Standards?  I wanted to find out from the experts what pots and burners were used in the Adlake lanterns. Most I have seen from photos have fuel pots marked with Adlake letters that match either the top of the lantern markings (Adlake) or the bottom or in other words were some what of a match. Recently I saw an Adlake lantern with an Armspear burner, and I wanted to find out if interchanging of burners with lamp manufacturers was common. I also saw a fellow with an Adlake lantern with a Handlan burner. What I wanted to get an idea on was how common was it for Adlake lanterns to come up with other burners and maybe a reference to go to when I see a lamp manufacturer with a different burner than the lamp housing. It seems parts were very interchangeable and this really can add to the confusion. Lastly did Dressel lanterns always have Dressel burners/pots marked Dressel? Thanks for the time and rules of thumb would be great to start with.  Posted Tuesday, February 25, 2020 by Ed F   Post a Reply  Email a reply

A. When RR's bought new lanterns and signal lamps -- sometimes by the thousands -- they would almost certainly be delivered with burners provided and marked by the original supplier. But RR's beginning even in the 1880's formed the American Railroad Association (ARA) which turned into the Association of American RR's (AAR) and those organizations had and have many technical committees with representatives from all the various RR's and also from suppliers. Standardization of various parts --including rolling stock, track parts, and auxiliary items such as lamps and lanterns, and much else -- is a main objective of those committees. This work insures that the parts meet the harsh requirements of service on the RR's, and insures interchangeability of parts between units from the different suppliers. This encourages competition, minimizes spare parts inventories, and keeps the costs down for the RR's. So once items are placed in service, 'mix and match' of components is very, very common.  Posted Tuesday, February 25, 2020 by RJMc

A. Thank you for such a quick response.I am a pure novice and trying to tie it all together. It certainly helps explain why I was seeing different burners and pots on manufactures. Wanted to run three combinations by the experts I have recently seen when viewing lanterns in collections trying to learn or for sale. The mix and match I have seen recently are listed below. Please let me know what combinations you see as legit or in other words would make sense. Tried to list the most recent. 1. An Armspeare 1925 lantern with an Armspeare burner and wick adjuster on a NO.300 Kero pot. 2. Dressel lantern with a NO.300 Kero pot/burner/wick adjuster 3. An Adlake 4-63 Lantern with a Handlan burner/fuel pot and circular marked Handlan wick adjuster. Comments much appreciated. It seems like the NO 300 Kero pot was quite popular and I assume was used in all Adlake lamps even those listed as the 250 or 100 series?? Lastly are there any combinations that would never occur or is it just wide open on mix and match as originally stated in response to my post. Again many thanks for the opportunity to get some answers on a very complicated part of history...the railroads! Posted Thursday, February 27, 2020 by ED

A.  In the Search Archived Q&A's by question number check out #2168 and also check in the Home Page item "Lanterns" and then the item for "Lantern Oddities".  Posted Thursday, February 27, 2020 by KM

A. Railroad companies for almost the entire existence of the industry have been VERY "low margin" businesses. That means usually almost, if not actually, bankrupt. Under these conditions new equipment (with matched parts) and replacement parts for the equipment in hand have often been non-existent. When you are out in some field, in the rain or snow, trying to do the job, there are NO limits on what might get put together, even if it takes hammering things to get them to almost fit. And often in railroading a lot of mechanically very smart people have had time on their hands. So mixing and matching parts of various things, and getting them to work afterwards, rates as almost a contact sport and challenging entertainment for railroaders. I can say with a fair degree of assurance: if the parts can be put together, and preferably made to work together, somebody on some railroad has done it. There is no stigma attached to parts that have mingled if function is maintained. It is much more the case that there may be bonus points if all the parts are original.  Posted Monday, March 2, 2020 by RJMc

 Q3720 Brass Luggage Tag  The Wilkes Heritage Museum has a brass luggage tag from the Southern Railway Company. It has no identification numbers on the tag so I was wondering if it was used to send items between the railway company and not used on individual luggage. Is this correct?  Posted Tuesday, February 11, 2020 by MP   Post a Reply  Email a reply

A. Especially since your tag has no identification number, it would be a tremendous help if you would post a picture of it. As you suspect, railroad operations had several types of metal tags made. A luggage/baggage tag given to a passenger as a claim check to retrieve an article would have an identification number stamped in it. They were made in pairs, and one would be attached to the item, the other given to the passenger to prove ownership when claimed. If you aren't sure how to submit a photo, use "Email a question" to the webmaster with an attachment. Thanks ! Would love to see it. Posted Saturday, February 15, 2020 by JMS

A. Please post a picture ?  Posted Wednesday, February 26, 2020 by JMS

 Q3719 RR Candle Lantern?  It has been a while since I last posted about this candle lamp I found in my possession - [Question 3605]. I was looking at the lantern again today and discovered something I should have seen before. On the back door of the lantern there is a piece of purple glass stored in a slot. I was able to remove the purple glass from the compartment. It is the perfect size to slide down in a compartment on the front of the lantern behind the clear glass. In previous posts I pointed out that the side hinged doors on the right and left side reveal a green glass panel on one side and a red glass panel on the other. I have attached 2 pictures - one showing the purple glass in the compartment at the rear of the lantern and one showing the purple glass in position on the front of the lantern. I don't know if this would help anyone to further identify this lantern as to what kind it is, but I hope it will help shed some light. I appreciate any comments on the identity of this lantern. Thank you.   [Click on image for larger version.] Posted Sunday, February 9, 2020 by WJ   Post a Reply  Email a reply

A. On reflection (pun somewhat intended) that purple panel makes the darkroom application even more likely, with the side panels fairly obviously designed to totally shut off any light leakage from the unselected sides of the lamp. The different kinds of emulsions used for glass plate negatives, printing papers, and later films (all to produce black-and-white or sepia monochrome images) respond to different light colors and correspondingly DON't respond to selected colors -- such as the colors in this lamp.  Posted Monday, February 10, 2020 by RJMc

A. This is a German carbide railroad lamp minus the water/carbide reservoir. WWII versions are marked on the back of the reservoir with a Waffin Mark, later versions are marked with a winged railraod wheel DB(Deutch Bundesbahn}. KFK Posted Monday, February 10, 2020 by KFK

A. Correction to previous post misspelled-should be "Waffen" Mark. Also, adjustments on German carbide lamps on top behind curved vent-maybe an earlier version with adjustments on inside of lamp. Posted Tuesday, February 11, 2020 by KFK

 Q3718 Diameter of Lamp Wick  I have just acquired an Adlake #1112 switch lantern. It is missing the glass chimney and the wick. I found the glass chimney on the W. T. Kirkman web site but I am not sure of the diameter of the wick that I would need to return the lantern to full functionality. If anyone could let me know the diameter, it would be very helpful. Thanks in advance. Best regards, Posted Saturday, February 8, 2020 by JW   Post a Reply  Email a reply

A. The Link is to the archives here on the RRiana site where the Adlake catalog materials are available. The document at the Link discusses (with dimensions) almost every type of burner imaginable for use in Adlake lamps and spends a couple of pages extolling their special round center core wicks. But they never give the diameter, just their part no. for the wick. Link 1  Posted Saturday, February 8, 2020 by RJMc

A. Go back and ask Woody Kirkman via email or send ADLAKE an email, they have a web site. I think they'll help you out. Posted Sunday, February 9, 2020 by LC

A. If you take the burner to a good hardware store or camping supplies store that has kerosene lantern wick for sale (I checked, and even WalMart sells wick!) you should be able to fit the burner with a correct size. It's not rocket science - the edges of the wick should not crowd the burner, and thickness should roll through it readily. Wicks are made in several standard sizes.  Posted Saturday, February 15, 2020 by JMS

 Q3717 MKT Cast Iron SIgn  Have cast iron sign. Does anyone have any information about such item? Regards,   [Click on image for larger version.] Posted Wednesday, February 5, 2020 by Mark   Post a Reply  Email a reply

A. This is a "Trust Plate" which would have been fastened to the side of a piece of rolling stock to indicate that the Repulic Bank loaned the money to buy the equipment to the MKT RR, sometime around 1956. The physical plates on the car was evidence of the bank's security interest until the loan was repaid. See prior Q's here on the site: nos. 3361, 3332, and several other earlier ones mentioned in those first two, for a lot of discussion about trust plates. As mentioned in those earlier answers, a major RR such as the MKT in any given year might have financed millions of dollars to acquire hundreds or thousands of pieces of rolling stock, each of which would have carried a plate such as yours on each side. So they are not uncommon.  Posted Wednesday, February 5, 2020 by RJMc

A. The Katy Railroad Historical Society (see Link) might be able to give you more details about what equipment MKT bought with the proceeds of "Series 1956" loans. Or there are several libraries with collections of MKT documtmens, including Annual Reports for the 1956 time period, but none of the actual documents seem to be available online.  Link 1  Posted Wednesday, February 5, 2020 by RJMc

 Q3716 Sign Help Needed  On this website the oval 15 inch Stop, Look, Listen signs are said to be fakes. I recently came across an 18 3/4 inch by 14 1/8 inch oval Stop, Look ,Listen sign. Is this sign just a larger version of the 15 inch fake? Other than the size difference the 2 signs are somewhat different being that the larger sign has a number cast onto it in between the words look and listen. This number does look a little crooked. Was this sign in any size ever used on an actual railroad or are they all fantasy pieces? Thank you in advance for all help answering these questions.   [Click on image for larger version.] Posted Saturday, January 25, 2020 by DBN   Post a Reply  Email a reply

A. I am looking at a similar sign in the same size as yours (18+ inches wide x 14+ inches high). The one I have is authentic to the Western Maryland Ry. and probably served there on a back-country road crossing from about 1910 -- when the RR was built -- until the 1960's. I recovered it in pieces from thick weeds after the track had been removed. However, the letter font on mine is much plainer than the one you have (all the sides of the letters are straight) and it does not have a mold number. The hole pattern in your sign is consistent with having been mounted at a crossing. Knowing how much RR practices varied, I would never say that 'ALL 15" signs are fake' but most of them seen for sale today may well be reproductions (many in cast aluminum rather than cast iron), and more and more seem to be reproduced. Cast iron signs are very easily made in quantity in almost any foundry using an original sign as the pattern. This makes it almost impossible to tell ones which have actually seen RR service from reproductions, without knowing verified history for a particular sign. Unfortunately, our latter-day reproducers are now even adding details such as mounting holes, and some are even shooting bullet holes into their reproductions in additon to the applied weathering.  Posted Saturday, January 25, 2020 by RJMc

A. Being painted all white it would be hard to read it at distance so the paint job certainly isn't authentic. Most are white background and black letters. Posted Sunday, January 26, 2020 by LC

A. I was presuming that any paint had been sandblasted off; the grayish paint on there looks like primer applied later. The WM signs had black painted letters for 'stop' and 'listen' and red painted letters for 'look' on a bright white painted background. As to sizes which may have been used, standardization of signs at grade crossings began even earlier than 1927. The various state highway departments and the Association of American Railroads (AAR) all played a part in setting and enforcing the standards -- which often controlled who was stuck with liability after a grade crossing collision -- a major cost factor for the RR's. See prior Q's 3067, 2284. and 1324 about grade crossing signs. I went back and checked two of the landmark documents concerning standard highway signs, one from 1927 and one from 1935. Neither one addressed oval signs such as we are considering, only crossbucks and round advance warning signs which they were attempting to make very, very standard, nationally, even then. I suspect most RR's that had used the oval signs just added crossbucks to the poles, and left the cast iron signs in place as additonal protection.  Link 1  Posted Monday, January 27, 2020 by RJMc

 Q3715 Inspector's Lantern?  We inhereited this copper/brass lantern singed Joseph Ratcliff & Sons Birmingham. I’ve been researching but really having a hard time deciding if it is a railroad lamp or not. Can you help? Thank you so much,   [Click on image for larger version.] Posted Friday, January 24, 2020 by Patrice   Post a Reply  Email a reply

A. Not a railroad/railway lamp but possibly maritime. Made in Birmingham, England. Posted Saturday, January 25, 2020 by JAJ

A.  See Q 3708 for information about lantern and lamp manufacturers from Birmingham,UK. The list that shows maker marks says that the Ratcliff family was in the copper and brass forming business since 1842. Your lamp appears to be a candle lamp and not oil fired with a burner and tank and that may help date it. The sides and back of the lamp are not painted and it may have been placed into an alcove or nook in a wall on a boat. You may want to contact the Central Public Library in Birmingham and ask them for help with your research.  Link 1  Posted Saturday, February 1, 2020 by KM

 Q3714 Question on Keystone Casey Lantern  One of my Keystone Casey lanterns has an etched globe with the PRR Keystone logo. I am always suspicious of etched globes and suspect this was the handiwork of some shady antique dealer. Regardless however I am inquiring as to if there is any known history of Casey globes such as this one? Thank you for any information you can offer.   [Click on image for larger version.] Posted Tuesday, January 21, 2020 by Alan   Post a Reply  Email a reply

A. The good group Key Lock & Lantern did globe surveys some years ago and reports that the Pennsylvania Railroad did use Keystone Casey lanterns. Also, the PRR did have 5-3/8" clear globes etched PRR in a keystone (See the list, link 1). Also reported in this design were clear cast, red cast, blue etched and red etched globes. If I'm not mistaken, Casey lanterns will accept any of the 5-3/8 - 5-1/2 inch globes (somebody correct me if I am wrong?). That said, simply because of its size, the great big keystone does tend to make one wonder if it is fake, but I am not familiar enough with PRR to know. And fake etching is always possible.  Link 1  Link 2  Posted Wednesday, January 22, 2020 by JMS

 Q3713 Lantern Help Needed  I have an Adlake railroad lantern that I came across while visiting Tower, Minnesota many years ago. The cap says DM&I RR. Is the identification indicating Duluth Missabe & Iron Range? The single 'I' makes me question whether it would be Iron Range. It also has a bulb in it with wiring. Thank you for any help or info you can give me.   [Click on image for larger version.] Posted Thursday, January 16, 2020 by Alana   Post a Reply  Email a reply

A. Possible explanation--Officially the DM&IR Railway, so the RR here is not for Railroad....just a spacing error. Another sample might read "DM&IR Ry.", with the small y left out on yours but the period is there. Posted Thursday, January 16, 2020 by ShastaRoute

A. Try Q2285 if you need any more confusion. Posted Thursday, January 16, 2020 by ShastaRoute

A. The lantern is marked for the Duluth Missabe & Iron Range Railway Company - no doubt about it. An Adlake worker just accidentally left off the last "Y" when making up the stamping die, is all. These lanterns are industrial artifacts made to a price and so production was fast and quality assurance probably minimal. Several ones I have are just stamped DM&IR. Others are stamped DM&IR RY. As for the light bulb, it is a later addition by someone trying to make the lantern into a table lamp or porch light; it is nothing the railroad did.  Posted Friday, January 17, 2020 by JEM

A. After doing some digging, I found out the lantern is from a resort outside of Tower, MN. It was used on an old wooden bridge that joined mainland to a small island to mark the channel for boats. The owner of the resort electrified one red and one green. Turns out to be a good piece of lake memorabilia. Thanks for all the info.  Posted Friday, January 17, 2020 by Alana

 Q3712 PRR Dietz '999' Lanterns?  Did the PRR (Pennsylvania Railroad) use the Dietz '999' lantern? Are they rare?  Posted Thursday, January 16, 2020 by JFR   Post a Reply  Email a reply

A. Not rare if marked for the NY Central or not marked for any Rail Road. Others may be rare depending on which Rail Road they're marked for. See Link 1 Link 1  Posted Saturday, January 18, 2020 by LC

 Q3711 Car ID?  From a recovered copy of the 1912-13 'Oregana' (University of Oregon) yearbook. Alleged to be Glee Club boarding train in Eugene for points south in Oregon on Southern Pacific's O&C Siskiyou Line/Shasta Route. Letterboards read 'Oregon & Washington'. Can we identify the car class and likely origin...Pullman? (Image is referred to in Q.3595)   [Click on image for larger version.] Posted Sunday, January 12, 2020 by ShastaRoute   Post a Reply  Email a reply

A. I had almost concluded the internet would be useless when I finally stumbled over this (**commercial**) site and a discourse on the C-4 class of cars built by Pullman in 1909-12 (Link 1). They mentioned the Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co., but not the earlier 1906-11 Oregon and Washington Railroad Company [O&W RR Co.]. However, Wikipedia had a 1910 ad for these Pullman-Harriman Steel Coaches with the correct O&W RR lettering and thence UP and SP logos overlaid. [The Shasta Limited is mentioned in the ad.] UP had an equipment purchasing pool for all the Harriman component roads, but O&W was a wholly owned entity capitalized at $1 million and kept under tight control off the equities markets. But it does appear from this photo that the equipment and services may have been shared over some portion of the Espee lines south of Portland prior to the Federal order to break up the conglomerate. Some later (P-6 Pacific) engines ordered for O&W and assigned numbers apparently arrived with numbers for another component road. O&W was gone (into O-W RR &N) completely by February 1911, but re-painting cars might have been slower. I did not locate car numbers for O&W Harrimans. Rail service on the northern end [Portland-Seattle] starts around 1909, and the Shasta Limited was put on display in 1910-or-11 at what was then called the Oregon and Washington Station ( a newspaper article was cited). I can't say if any of the Harriman cars were cut-in for a portion of the routing or if any ran through the Oregon section. O&W was running three trains over the short portion. Of course, I found all of this without any hard paper references in hand so errors are possible at this point. Link 1  Posted Sunday, January 12, 2020 by ShastaRoute

A. A modeler's blog (Link 1) with some background information on these kind of cars. Link 1  Posted Sunday, February 2, 2020 by ShastaRoute